|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Team 842 Tranmission Spine
For what it's worth, I agree with Andy. However, the real message here is not that AM Shifters, purchased before 2007 Kickoff, either are or are not legal for 2007 FRC events. The message is that this is an unresolved question.
We all (teams, volunteers, suppliers, etc.) need an official response from the GDC, on the FIRST Q&A Forum, to settle the question. And soon. I'm fairly sure that the question has been submitted and that the question and the response will be published together in due course. EDIT: A related response has been published, saying that the AndyMark AM-2 shifter would be considered a COTS MECHANISM. Last edited by Richard Wallace : 11-01-2007 at 22:17. |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: Team 842 Tranmission Spine
Fredi,
New advice... just use the unmodified Trannies off of your robot from last year. Oddly enough, those are legal. Andy |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 842 Tranmission Spine
Andy,
You leave me more confused than ever. In the First Q&A they sound like they've ruled the AM Shifter as a mechanism and mechanisms are not allowed from previous robots per <R28>. What am I missing? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: team 842 batter with mount | falconmaster | Robot Showcase | 10 | 05-02-2006 10:57 |
| pic: installed battery team 842 | falconmaster | Robot Showcase | 11 | 04-02-2006 09:36 |
| pic: Turret team 842 | falconmaster | Robot Showcase | 3 | 01-02-2006 17:28 |
| WIRED magazine- team 842 | OneAngryDaisy | FIRST In the News... | 11 | 31-03-2005 08:28 |
| pic: Falcon Robotics 842 Entry in the MATE ROV Championships | falconmaster | Extra Discussion | 1 | 16-01-2005 12:52 |