|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: 114 Drive base CAD
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
Looks nice! It looks like it would be sturdy enough to run it without bumpers, is that what you guys plan on doing? Also, how much does the whole assembly weigh?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
We are going to be attaching bumpers. The weight, according to Inventor, is 37 pounds, Including motors. I believe that it is lighter than that, and my personal estimate is that it will weigh in at 32 pounds.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
That looks pretty darn nice. I like the massive gear boxes. Hope it rusn well for ya guys. btw, if you're allowed to say, what are you guys planning for scoring this year?
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
Quote:
Anoy comments on the drivetrain from one so advanced at drive design as yourself? |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
I'm pretty sure it won't. In my experience, Inventor doesn't add weights too well. I've used its own numbers on material and come out heavier on an assembly than it has. Not sure yet who's right--me or it--as I haven't tested anything yet that I've CADed.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
It's worked out pretty well for us... we assign electronics items, pistons, motors their correct weight values, and it gives us a pretty accurate total weight.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
"Lightning" Holes.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
Seams lot of teams are not planning on climbing a ramp. What ramp entrance angle can your fram handle?
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
Once we put the roller of doom, we can take up to a 30 degree ramp. And if we are forced to climb a 30 degree ramp, then someone's team hasn't made the best choices in being nice to their alliance.
|
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
Is this the full 28x38 footprint?
Edit: Yes it is, Thank you (I am no good at typing) Last edited by Cody Carey : 19-01-2007 at 00:41. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
The bot is 26x34, to allow for some fun "toys" to be added onto the frame.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 114 Drive base CAD
That sounds way familiar... We just had the parts for a new module I designed sent out for cutting, and they look beautiful. I'll try to post pictures... I think our entire frame ends up at 26x34 as well, except we are a wide bot.It weighs in at 34lbs.
You are adding a "roller of death" ??? ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 114 CAD idea | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 7 | 24-12-2006 19:01 |
| pic: 114 drive base CAD | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 4 | 15-12-2006 00:31 |
| pic: 114 drive module design | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 3 | 06-12-2006 21:59 |
| pic: 114 Coaxial Final CAD | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 3 | 01-07-2006 22:45 |
| pic: Possible Team 114 Drive Component | James114 | Extra Discussion | 14 | 15-01-2005 12:27 |