|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Conflict with rules R05 & R06?
Remember, inspectors are not the only line of defense here. Both R05 and R06 contain wording that indicates that both the design AND use of these mechanisms is considered when evaluating compliance with the rule. You are 100% correct that you do not know how the robot will be used, so why should you make a judgment on it (as long as it's not a safety issue)? Leave it to the referees, that's why they're there! Some rules are game-time rules and are not the inspector's place to judge.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Conflict with rules R05 & R06?
I believe that last year one of the inspection points was checking the wedge design.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Separate Processor & Robot Rules | JoeXIII'007 | Control System | 7 | 20-01-2006 19:59 |
| Robot Weight Limit: Rule Conflict | Specialagentjim | Rules/Strategy | 10 | 06-08-2005 17:52 |
| Autonomous robots working & interacting with each other & their environment. | Elgin Clock | Math and Science | 0 | 19-05-2005 01:00 |
| Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? | gnormhurst | Programming | 3 | 22-02-2004 02:55 |
| Rule <R06> | Jack | Technical Discussion | 18 | 11-01-2004 13:36 |