|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
Quote:
In a week or 2 when you are deep in build and they understand the game and the principals of FIRST a little more then they will have forgotten about their silly little question. Hopefully. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
We have a zippy little robot that we take to our recruiting demos that drives around and always has a load of tootsie rolls as give aways. A small robot filled with tootsie rolls kind of sends its own message. With that little guy, we also have the FIRST robot, usually the one from the past season. We also have a display close by that showcases the team efforts: the build, the outreach, the fundraising, the team. The display is a great way to talk to prospective members about what the team is all about. When we are asked questions about the type of competitions we are involved in, we provide the information and the fun and they decide if they want to be a part of it. The important thing is that we continue to put the message out there and are happy doing so.
Jane Last edited by JaneYoung : 19-01-2007 at 16:06. Reason: word change |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
I'm actually happy that Battlebots is around. Battlebots gets the kind of attention that we would kill for here at FIRST and their PR people need to be commended for it. Their program gets our kids interested. From there, we tweak the kids' ideologies a bit, and little by little, they turn into FIRSTers. So as much as I'm not a supporter of the way that Battlebots runs their program and the aims of their game, I'm thrilled that they're getting the culture interested in science. If they're getting the objectives accomplished, all the more power to them.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
It usually goes like this for me:
Me: "The robots are contstructed a lot like Battlebots, that you see on TV" Stranger: "Oh!" Me: "but these don't fight, they work together" Stranger: "ooohhhh" |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
Quote:
Just remind them that FIRST is about much more than destruction. The value of everything you get out of FIRST makes up for tearing apart someone's robot. And, I always like to add in, it's not like we're "playing nice," there's definitely defense and ramming and pushing. It's not all innocent offense. ~__^ |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
o well maybe it just the kids around here at our club fairs, but the second we start off, with "no the robots can harm each other," they hightail it out of there and are never seen again, but whatever, we do have a dedicated team of people that actually care, and help us stick to our game plan and team moto and guide lines
we have had kids show up to meetings and just stop because the robots dont do dammage to each other. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
In 2005, we did a FIRST demo with several other teams in the Southern California area at JPL, and these guys came up as we were talking about it. He asked if it was a Battlebot, and when I said no, he started flaming it and ended it saying it was a waste of metal. Then other people came and said how much more useful and beneficial FIRST is to today's teenagers than Battlebots is. They pretty much just walked away.
At school demos, we also get a few people come up to us and ask us if the robots we build are Battlebots or how much damage they can do. Tends to get sort of boring after a while saying the same answer.. ![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
There is nothing wrong with battle bots, it just isn't FIRST, it is still a really cool engineering competition. If you are worried about losing kids because they just want to build battle bots let them drive a full size FIRST bot, that has a tendency to hook them, then explain to them that the things they learn in FIRST they can use later to make a battle bot or what ever they want to make.
I have also noticed that shooting poof balls at things tends to have a simmilar enough effect to destroying things to keep kids interested. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
we have the same problem, kids at first are like why do we not put a saw on it or something, and go destroy other robots. Then we have to go through the GP (gracious professionalism) talk.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
We tell them our competitions are pretty rough, but our sport is more like football, not gladiators. We invest $6,000 to $15,000 in the robot competition and we would hate to see it all destroyed in one match.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
We get this on our team just like any other; our response is always "sorry, but you know this is a school team, and the district won't allow something like that." Actually I know our officers a few years ago actually looked at doing a Battlebot in addition to FIRST but the idea faded out somewhere.
Show them some of the other cool things you can do. Build something that shoots stuff for the off-season; shooting things seems to be just as cool as smashing them, at least that's what our t-shirt cannon (and the ones other teams have built) have proven. You will inevitably have to mention you can't do that though, and if they leave purely because of that then they probably weren't actually interested in building a robot in the first place, they just wanted to be the driver for smashing things. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
I actually got involved with FIRST because I was a huge fan of the British TV show Robot Wars. Back when I was in early middle school, it was on at midnght on Saturday nights on my local PBS station. (I wasn't allowed to stay up that late, so I had to tape it and watch it the next day.) My brother and I loved the show and always wanted to build our own robot and be on it. PBS took the show off the air after a litle more than a year (I was so mad I wrote them an angry letter demanding it be put back on.) When I was a freshman, my science teacher told our class about the robotics team that he was starting up at our school. I probably would've never given it a thought if it hadn't been for Robot Wars, but I did and now my brother and I are devoted members of our team.
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
I understand it seems like every kid you try to recruit wants to make destructive robots,
but in all reality, you just have to show them what FIRST is made of, and get them to understand that you can have fun without being a "battlebot". They may not believe you if you just explain it, but have them try it out. Tell them to give it a shot. You never know who might end up interested in it in the end. Believe me, I've explained to many many freshman at my school that we dont build robots with saws and hammers popping out. but in the end, your result may be not too dissapointing. |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Giving First A bad name
I don't think Battle Bots gives FIRST a bad name. I have found it a bit challenging to explain to potential members that we do no build robots to intentionally damage the other robots. Sometimes it is hard for them to grasp that concept and they want to attempt to do it anyways. But once we really drill into their heads that we build to just compete (not damage) they let it go. Trying to explain gracious professionalism to someone who wants to destroy other bots in kinda hard haha. But Battle Bots does get kinds interested based on the fact they build robots and compete them; just not destroy. It's a good segway for Battle Bots to FIRST. Now only if we could get FIRST their own television series
haha. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The spirit of giving - PA system | sanddrag | General Forum | 22 | 12-03-2008 17:43 |
| MPlab giving problems?(or it's us?) | Bomberofdoom | Programming | 2 | 11-01-2007 10:28 |
| Battle-Bots vs. FIRST: good or bad? | Kojib | Televised Robotics | 11 | 01-03-2004 02:01 |
| New Joysticks...Good or Bad Choice by FIRST? | AlphaOmega870 | Programming | 46 | 08-02-2004 23:54 |
| Regarding giving out FIRST info | ThiefOfTheNight | Fundraising | 2 | 08-01-2003 17:16 |