Go to Post The teams that do the right thing for the sake of doing the right thing, and for believing in the message of FIRST deserve to be recognized. - Madison [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2007, 22:40
Tom Bottiglieri Tom Bottiglieri is offline
Registered User
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,186
Tom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond reputeTom Bottiglieri has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance partner stories

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgredalertcc View Post
you can't really have good or bad partners.
Sure you can. Every robot is different. Every drive team is different. Some are good, some are bad. Why do you think teams like 71, 254, and 25 go out and win every year? It's because they're good!
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2007, 22:52
Ericgehrken's Avatar
Ericgehrken Ericgehrken is offline
Registered User
AKA: 3 Teams in 3 Seasons
FRC #0190 (Gompei and the Herd)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Southington
Posts: 560
Ericgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud ofEricgehrken has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Ericgehrken Send a message via Yahoo to Ericgehrken
Re: Alliance partner stories

If you're on an alliance with two "sitting duck" robots then your robot should be self-sufficient enough so that it could pretty much win the match single- handedly with little offensive help pending the fellow alliance members do not attain any penalties.
__________________
Team 3125
GHAMAS FIRST Robotics
Team President and Founder
2010-
2010 Suffield Shakedown Winner Thanks 178 and 177
2010 WPI Regional Rookie All Star
2010 WPI Dean's List Finalist
Team 195 Member 2007-2009
2007 CT Regional Winner Thanks to 1124 and 558
2008 FIRST Presidents Circle Winner
2009 Suffield Shakedown Winner thanks to 126 and 1124
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2007, 01:35
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,506
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Alliance partner stories

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri View Post
Sure you can. Every robot is different. Every drive team is different. Some are good, some are bad. Why do you think teams like 71, 254, and 25 go out and win every year? It's because they're good!
Not meaning to be negative, but even those teams have made mistakes. Don't misinterpret me, they are great teams and I look up to all of them (Look at the teaser I just posted for some 60/254 inspiration), but I'm sure they have had some mistakes in matches or broken parts that lost a match for their partners. Bottom line is, even the greatest teams make mistakes every once in a while.

So, unless they try to lose it, there isn't really a bad alliance partner.

I'm sure 71's 2002 alliance wasn't that upset when the broke the wheel.

Or, in 2005 on Galileo (?) we lost a match with team 25 and they had been stuck in a tetra (we eventually nudged them free, but it took a while) and I admit i was upset. For some scoring miscalculation they replayed it and team 25 played awesome and we won it. In hindsight I shouldn't have been upset at them at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Alliance in the Alliance Era of FIRST Corey Balint General Forum 28 05-09-2006 20:14
rookie teams for alliance partner akshar General Forum 28 29-01-2005 12:51
Rigged partner assignments? SilverStar General Forum 25 30-03-2004 15:59
about picking up your alliance partner archiver 2000 1 23-06-2002 22:34
254 The Best Partner in FIRST sfield Regional Competitions 5 03-04-2002 23:23


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi