|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
rule <g29> and flag
does our flag count toward dimensions on our robot? we were thinking about making a robot 36" but the flag would go over the 38" rule, allowing for us to stay upright instead of sitting on end, as stated by gdc in the q&a forums here. does this violate rules or isnt ethical or doesnt count? or is it legal?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: rule <g29> and flag
well, first of all, i would guess that you meant that the rule was 48 inches.. because it is, and no, the flag does not count as the overall hieght.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: rule <g29> and flag
no i meant as in that since the longest dimension has to be the vertical one at the beginning then that means that a 28*38 robot that is 36" high must start on the 38" side. with this i mean that first of all which side do they want the flag on since a flag holder modified to change the orientation of the flag would likely be illegal so if we end up changing the "vertical" side of our robot then which side would it have to be on? and second does the flag (something that would put said 36" robot over 38", therefore making the other side the max dimension and totally putting the rule out of wack) change the sizing?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: rule <g29> and flag
From <R11>:
Quote:
Quote:
Mike |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: rule <g29> and flag
They even state in the Q&A that if flopping is an issue then make a mast higher than your length an then you wouldn't have to flop over.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rule G29 | stillwaters130 | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 01-08-2007 06:14 PM |
| rule G20 and G48 | paradoxal | Rules/Strategy | 13 | 01-08-2007 08:22 AM |
| Rule G11 and Springs Rule | mtaman02 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 01-23-2004 05:43 PM |
| seat motors and rule M1 | Matt Krass | General Forum | 5 | 01-06-2003 08:42 PM |
| IMPORTANT RULE ADDITION AND CLARIFICATION | Mike McIntyre | OCCRA | 0 | 12-03-2001 10:17 PM |