What will be more important?

[Charger_07]

i didnt think about that until now, i dont think i can change the poll though

[Ian Curtis]

Originally Posted by Arefin Bari

Where is the option for both?



Take a look at Team 71's 2002 robot. =)

71 ran to the goal on wheels, then clamped on and did the whole "This 800 pound conglomerate of robots and goals is going to our zone" deal. Not that it really mattered, probably Beatty could've "walked" all the way but they may not have made it to their own zone in 2 minutes. Their arms pretty much covered the field. I wish I lived in Hammond...

And in 2004, pushing power was important. Mobile goals under ball drops were very, very nice things to have.

[burkey_turkey]

an interesting point one of our alum/mentor/college students brought up is that in a first game, when you are going for speed, you are also going for acceleration. the field is pretty tiny, and considering the rack is in the very middle, your robot does not have much space to get up to speed if its super fast. building a light robot that can accelerate quickly, even if it has a slower top speed, can make the difference and get you there first. our robot this year looks like it is going to be 20 pounds or so underweight, so we are debating whether to leave it underweight and acclerate quickly (the get there faster option) or add a pnumatic braking system like our last years robot (the stay there longer option). there are clear advantages to both, so its a hard choice to make. i think everyone can agree that speed is key for the scoring bots though.

i kind of have a question to ask too, if noone minds. In this years game, assuming each alliance has two good scorers and one bot thats more defense/ramp, will the rack be able to fill up copmletely before the end of the game? do you think that the rack could theoretically be full with 30-45 seconds left and then its just alot of mooving spoilers around? if this is the case then the strategy changes, because now it the key is keeping your ringers not scoring more, which means you need torque and the ability to push. just something to think about....

[nuggetsyl]

Speed. If you question me you get a 10 point penalty.

[Dan Petrovic]

Originally Posted by Arefin Bari

Where is the option for both?



Take a look at Team 71's 2002 robot. =)

If a team beat them to the goals, what happened then?

[DBiehl]

I personally think speed will be better, just because if you can get the ringers up fast enough, as long as no one's focusing just on you, you're going to get points up quicky. Sort of like the Triplets last year with their robots, if you left them open for one second they were able to score their entire hoard on you.

[Gabe]

The ultimate answer is a two-speed transmission. However, overall I am going to say that speed will probably be more important because getting where you want to very quickly will allow you to carry out any stategies you have more effectively.

[Pavan Dave]

Speed to me is important but not as important as torque. If you can make a robot go fast, IMO* its like saying "catch me if you can," and whenever the fast bot is caught it gets beat up because it can not stand its ground. Although you should be able to be fast and agile to be able to deflect a defensive maneuver by the other team, I believe that you should be able to stand your ground. This is what I learned last year when watching some of the regionals and comparing it to a match or two of our own robot. That although we were fast, we got pushed around in key spots where if we had a little more power, we would have been able to make some big plays.

Of course this is me, and many of my peers disagree, but I think torque > speed.

Pavan.

*In My Opinion

[Nuttyman54]

Originally Posted by InfernoX14

If a team beat them to the goals, what happened then?

They latched on and dragged you with them.

[Charger_07]

i think we are focusing more on torque because we dont want to be pushed around when we try to score

[Justin M.]

Torque and manueverability. Torque for winning a pushing match, and manueverabilty for the precision driving to score on the rack.

I'd only say speed for quickness from/to the loading station or wall where the tubes are located.

[Ken Loyd]

My crystal ball tells me that many teams will give up on offense and concentrate on defense. It will be much easier to get in the way than score a ringer. Torque will rule in the middle game. Speed will be the winner in the end game. I feel many teams will spend the last 30 to 45 seconds of a match attempting to get off the ground. The final points scored in the match for raising a bot will win most matches. The few teams who can score in auto will be in demand for the finals.

Ken

[Brandon Holley]

Hands down you gotta give this years game to speed:

When you are "gearing for torque" with your robot, you are asking to do one thing...push other robots around so you don't get pushed around. Over my 6 years of FIRST I've come to the conclusion that pushing matches are THE BIGGEST waste of time. Ive taught our drivers that if you're approaching a team on the field, and it looks like its gonna end up as a pushing match, turn around and go the other way because all youa re doing is wasting time.

I would much rather be the team that can run all over the place without anyone catching me. If a team is blocking 1 leg, backup, get around them, and score on a different leg, and then get out of there. There is nothing to gain from aimlessly pushing people around.

People say the best offense is a good defense, but really, the best offense is forcing the other team to play defense because once they're not trying to score, they're not scoring. I'm not saying every robot thats "torqued out" is playing defense, but defensive bots tend to be the powerhouse drivetrains that can slap people around.

Just my 2 cents..

[Anubuss]

Originally Posted by Arefin Bari

Take a look at Team 71's 2002 robot. =)

Ah yes....the 'Beaty Shuffle' brings me back to my rookie year....but you know, while they were slow, before they completly revammed their drive train (and lost a bit of power in the process) they could easily be turned, a feat which the good old seniors of old demonstrated to the world at...I think it was the West Michigan Regional, but I'm not quite sure...memmories a little fuzzy.

[Donut]

I believe speed will eventually be better, just because I think that eventually the ringers will be the biggest factor in the game (note that eventually means by the playoffs of the Championship, I'm willing to bet ramp robots will dominate most of the early Regionals and possibly beyond that). I hope speed is better, our drive system is banking on it.