|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
We have been considering a wedge tipped device to get under the innertubes. However the rules imply no wedges on the robot. Do these include the actual device to get the innertubes or just the sides of the robot.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pick-up Device
I believe that rule <R05> clearly defines the purpose and usage guidelines for wedges, as you mention for picking up the inner tubes:
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pick-up Device
So IMO, don't deploy your "broom and dustpan" ringer-picker-upper while another robot is driveing by. But I would say that it's pretty easy to design something that would not physically be able to "wedge" a robot in any segnificant way. I don't remember the refs and inspectors being REALLY nit-picky about things, but if you did something that could maybe possibly be bad, but in 98% of circumstances wouldn't ammount to much, then they just tell you to be carefull!
Last edited by GMKlenklen : 01-02-2007 at 23:31. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Pick-up Device
Each inspector is different. It'a all about their interpretation of such vague rules. In my sincerest opinion, I would shy away from anything that could be seen by one ref as a rule breaker.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pick-up Device
Thanks for the posts. I think we will just have to go with our other design that we have been working on.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pneumatic device | wrenauld | Pneumatics | 3 | 24-01-2007 10:28 |
| Suction Device | Rob2713g | Technical Discussion | 16 | 01-06-2006 17:29 |
| External Output Device | magical hands | Programming | 5 | 15-03-2006 08:31 |
| Shifting Device | JT Academy | Technical Discussion | 28 | 05-02-2003 21:29 |
| Like Device | sasquatch | General Forum | 6 | 31-01-2002 08:51 |