|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Redesign, 36mm question.
I agree: The BaneBots trans is great, but it can be backdriven. You need to use a motor that is not backdriven, as squirrel mentioned. Some sprocket reduction - a tradeoff between power/durability and movement speed - and you should be good to go.
We did exactly that in our rookie year robot, a 12 tooth sprocket on the motor, about 48 tooth on the arm, using a window motor and the van door motor. The van door motor did the work, the window motor was there only because it did not backdrive - it acted as a brake of sorts. Don |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Banebots 36mm gearbox: Recommendations for use | Joe Johnson | Motors | 2 | 02-02-2007 17:10 |
| FirstCadLibrary Updated - 36mm Gearbox | Ed Sparks | Inventor | 2 | 13-01-2007 17:16 |
| 36mm BaneBots Gearmotor Model | Madison | Inventor | 5 | 10-01-2007 07:35 |
| Does anyone else forsee redesign problems? | Jon K. | Website Design/Showcase | 2 | 18-12-2004 18:02 |
| Team 121 redesign its website | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:00 |