|
|
|
 We had an over all losing record this year. When I look at kid's faces, they don't give a rip about that. I see excitement about the next event and talking about improvements for next year. Winning is nice, but that is not the reason I do what I do. - wilsonmw04 [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does 9.3.5 Match Ranking make sense?
9.3.5 says
"All teams on the winning ALLIANCE will receive a number of ranking points equal to the unpenalized score (the score without any assessed penalties) of the losing ALLIANCE." Let's assume Red scores 35-25=10 and Blue scores 20-5=15. Clearly, Blue wins 15-10. Now, according to the rule above Blue gets 35 ranking points. Question: Does it make sense for Blue to get 35 and not MIN(35,20)=20. Your thoughts, KA-108 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Open Challenge: Make a better FRC ranking algorithm | Billfred | Rules/Strategy | 67 | 28-10-2006 00:30 |
| Ok, this does not make sense.... | Michael Hill | Math and Science | 6 | 19-10-2005 17:42 |
| Threads getting too long to make sense of | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 22 | 05-05-2005 01:14 |
| What does your team use to make the clovers for tetras? | Tigerlily-87 | General Forum | 54 | 13-02-2005 20:03 |
| Does anyone have an idea on how to make a joystick program for an operating board? | necroprime | Programming | 8 | 09-11-2002 19:04 |
Threaded Mode