Go to Post Mistakes happen. It's how we react to them and what we learn from them that shows what type of people we are. - Daniel_LaFleur [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 23:00
newton418's Avatar
newton418 newton418 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ryan Newton
FRC #0418 (Purple Haze)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 58
newton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to all
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Yes, there has been an increase in the number of motors used on drive trains. But, the weight constraint keeps the robots’ pushing power in check. The grippiness of the tread available to us is currently limited, and with a maximum weight of about 148 lbs, a robot’s pushing force is bounded. With a shifting gear box, and proper ratios, the 4 small CIMs allow robots to have enough torque to spin their wheels against a wall, so the motors’ power is not the limiting factor.
Sure we might be able to slip the wheels faster, but a robot must be controllable, so the speed is limited too. And with shifting gearboxes becoming more accessible, there isn’t much reason to slip your wheels at 15 ft/sec. So, although there has been a Drive System Arms Race, other physical factors keep it in check.

Also, another potential solution is to limit the number of powerful motors (motors above 100W). The 2.5” CIMs, 3” CIMs, and FP motors make up ~85% of the total motor power. If, for instance, we only had the 4 small CIMs and then many less powerful motors, teams that want to get ahead in the FIRST Arms Race would have to slap on six extra motors instead of just two FP or two large CIMs.
I don’t know about all designs, but based on my experience I don’t think many other components require the power that a solid drive system does (except, perhaps, last year’s shooters), and we have pneumatics we can use. I really like the banebot motors, because they should be powerful enough for most arm/fork lifts, yet it would take three banebot motors to equal one CIM on a drive system, which just isn’t that practical for most teams.
__________________
Team 418 Purple Haze
http://www.lasarobotics.org/
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
paper: Omnidirectional Drive Systems Ian Mackenzie Technical Discussion 2 28-05-2006 14:22
Drive Systems Alex Cormier Technical Discussion 3 11-01-2005 16:07
FIRST impacting the presidential race? Tom Bottiglieri Rumor Mill 5 03-11-2004 18:04
Drive Systems Sachiel7 Technical Discussion 6 24-03-2003 16:10
drive systems Greg Perkins Technical Discussion 0 13-01-2003 09:40


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi