Go to Post drill holes, that should fix it - E. The Kidd [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 17:57
Woodie Flowers Award
Ken Patton Ken Patton is offline
purple
FRC #0051 (Wings of Fire)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 338
Ken Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond reputeKen Patton has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessica Boucher View Post
Go ahead, make the game more conducive to using those motors in other places. But don't restrict their use. It's the best tool we have.

I agree. I think that there has been a trend toward a more-pushing style of play, and it has contributed to more powerful drives. But the reasons for it - and the solutions - could be addressed in a different way.

I think the number one factor determining how we play the game is the game design. Not the kit, and not the robot rules. If the game design enables teams to do nothing but push others around and still be "successful," then teams will do it. This has been the case in the last few years (and probably this year too).

If the game design has a valuable feature that only requires robots to deliver in the last 15 seconds of the match, my guess is that teams who optimize for those 15 seconds are going to have some time on their hands to go stir up some trouble for the remaining 2 minutes.... IMHO, this feature of the game has nothing to do with how many motors we get.

If the game design has some really important yet difficult feature, you know, something crazy like shootin' balls through a hole at 30 feet, and many teams say that task is too much to handle, I think its highly likely that they are instead going to play some D on the teams that do shoot well.

Don't get me wrong, the robot rules have an impact. For example, the near-mandate for bumpers has, in my opinion, encouraged teams to ram into each other because now its "safe." Maybe the rules and refs should just say "don't ram into each other."

The kit has an impact too. When teams get a kit part that works great, they'll use it.

Maybe its better to use the game design, and not the kit+robotrules, to steer the horde of us robot-builders. I would rather be amazed by some creative games and designs than be forced to see lookalike robots from every part of the country (oops world). I think its more interesting and inspiring. So, let us use our motors freely, with lots of current, efficient transfer of power, and some serious traction. Then give us a game that makes our preconceived notions obselete .

I remember going to Houston in 1998 and seeing a bot that could move sideways. Talk about inspiring.....
Reply With Quote
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 18:16
Bharat Nain's Avatar
Bharat Nain Bharat Nain is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 2,000
Bharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond reputeBharat Nain has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Bharat Nain Send a message via MSN to Bharat Nain
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

With no disrespect meant to anyone, I think we have enough limits put on us. They tell us exactly how to do everything. If they now tell us exactly how to build our drive train with the exact gear ratios and the exact wheels and the exact motors, and the exact metal to use, and the exact shaft to use, then we will have no creativity left.

I also disagree on the part that FIRST is encouraging pushing and shoving matches. They have told us exactly when we can push in and pin in the rules book. I think they want to see teams become creative with mechanisms to cap the rack.

I do agree that they gave us too many motors, but I still think its good. Anyone who decides to put them all on their robot is going to have a tough time on the field. There isn't a strong enough battery and the most robots wont even have enough weight for it. The game demands for these options, though.
__________________
-= Bharat Nain =-

Whatever you do, you need courage. Whatever course you decide upon, there is always someone to tell you that you are wrong. There are always difficulties arising that tempt you to believe your critics are right. To map out a course of action and follow it to an end requires some of the same courage that a soldier needs. Peace has its victories, but it takes brave men and women to win them. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply With Quote
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 18:45
nuggetsyl's Avatar
nuggetsyl nuggetsyl is offline
Registered User
FRC #0025
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: north brunswick
Posts: 869
nuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond reputenuggetsyl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Dont forget motors weight alot. So sure put 8 motors on your drive.
__________________
00,12Championship winner
03,06,08 Championship finalist
02A,03C,06N,08C,11N,12G Division winner
00,03,06,07,08,10,12 NJ / MAR winner
11 VCU winner
06,10 Las Vegas winner
12 MAR Mt Olive
red is for team 348
Reply With Quote
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 20:14
Don Wright's Avatar
Don Wright Don Wright is offline
Registered User
FRC #0469
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 683
Don Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond reputeDon Wright has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Don Wright Send a message via Yahoo to Don Wright
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuggetsyl View Post
Dont forget motors weight alot. So sure put 8 motors on your drive.
We have...
__________________
Donald F. Wright Jr.
Product Manager
AVL Instrumentation & Test Systems, Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 23:00
newton418's Avatar
newton418 newton418 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ryan Newton
FRC #0418 (Purple Haze)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 58
newton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to allnewton418 is a name known to all
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Yes, there has been an increase in the number of motors used on drive trains. But, the weight constraint keeps the robots’ pushing power in check. The grippiness of the tread available to us is currently limited, and with a maximum weight of about 148 lbs, a robot’s pushing force is bounded. With a shifting gear box, and proper ratios, the 4 small CIMs allow robots to have enough torque to spin their wheels against a wall, so the motors’ power is not the limiting factor.
Sure we might be able to slip the wheels faster, but a robot must be controllable, so the speed is limited too. And with shifting gearboxes becoming more accessible, there isn’t much reason to slip your wheels at 15 ft/sec. So, although there has been a Drive System Arms Race, other physical factors keep it in check.

Also, another potential solution is to limit the number of powerful motors (motors above 100W). The 2.5” CIMs, 3” CIMs, and FP motors make up ~85% of the total motor power. If, for instance, we only had the 4 small CIMs and then many less powerful motors, teams that want to get ahead in the FIRST Arms Race would have to slap on six extra motors instead of just two FP or two large CIMs.
I don’t know about all designs, but based on my experience I don’t think many other components require the power that a solid drive system does (except, perhaps, last year’s shooters), and we have pneumatics we can use. I really like the banebot motors, because they should be powerful enough for most arm/fork lifts, yet it would take three banebot motors to equal one CIM on a drive system, which just isn’t that practical for most teams.
__________________
Team 418 Purple Haze
http://www.lasarobotics.org/
Reply With Quote
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2007, 23:05
pakratt1991's Avatar
pakratt1991 pakratt1991 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tim L.
FRC #0997 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Corvallis OR
Posts: 192
pakratt1991 is just really nicepakratt1991 is just really nicepakratt1991 is just really nicepakratt1991 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to pakratt1991 Send a message via MSN to pakratt1991 Send a message via Yahoo to pakratt1991
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

With FIRST crack down on weight this year I believe that the drive trains will be turning to less and less motors but with more and more design put inot making them more efficient.
This year we have a ver nice Drive train, it's accully a BEAST and was build with 2 speeds in, but we removed the faster one for weight reasons, and we bend a battery bolder when doing 360's with it, just from the centripital force >.>


Last edited by pakratt1991 : 21-02-2007 at 23:13.
Reply With Quote
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2007, 03:01
Gabe's Avatar
Gabe Gabe is offline
Pocket Full of Tools
FRC #0604 (Quixilver)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: California
Posts: 654
Gabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond reputeGabe has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Bigger, badder drivetrains will only get you so far in the world of FIRST. The best and most successful robots are those who innovate and design conservatively. The best teams are those who understand their robot inside out, and understand design limitations and design advantages. In other words, the teams that have a knowledge of what they are doing are in my mind the best teams.

This year our drivetrain is using two large CIM motors. And they do just fine, working great with our custom transmission. I will definately say that our drivetrain is modest compared to other, but mechanically it works, and that is key. I have seen many other teams with outrageous transmissions that are being pushed to (and sometimes beyond) their limits. Mentioned before, defense will only get you so far. Last year at SVR a student said something that I will always remember, that " defense doesn't show up on rankings". Teams that score point will always move the crowd.

I believe that FIRST includes too many motors. Really, 4 CIMs is really unecessary, as they simply seem to encourage teams to use them in tandem and the two large CIM minibike motors. I think FIRST should eliminate some of these drivetrain motors. My suggestion to encourage creative design is to change the rules to allow teams to dissasemble the window motors to use their electric motors, while at the same time allowing only two small CIMs and two large minibike CIMs for the robot.

I also want FIRST to bring back great games like 2004 and before. From waht I have heard, I missed out on the greatest game ever played, and from 2005 till today the field has been pretty much the same. I want FIRST to go back to having more obsacles and game pieces so that teams must dedicate themselves to specific tasks. This year I have seen FIRST make a move toward this, as teams are making hard choices in going with ramps, arms, or a combination of both. So I like where FIRST seems to be headed.
__________________
Team site: Q U I X I L V E R
My favorite tool is my imagination; I’m always finding new ways to use it.
Reply With Quote
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2007, 20:39
CraigHickman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

After thinking a while on this topic, I've decided to come back and offer another view. It might have been said already, and if so I apologize for restatement.

FIRST is giving us tools to deal with engineering issues in the real world. In the real world, there are no motor number constraints on an issue. If a problem needs 10, or even 15 motors to create a solution, the engineeris will add just that many motors. So I don't see the arms race as that much of an issue. Sure, more tourque helps. But you will find the teams that do the best have the simplest drive systems, and instead have poured their focus into the manipulators.

All in all, what my slightly mangled logic (I need sleep, and breaking a caffeine addiction isn't helping) is trying to say is that we're preparing for the real world, and so limiting something as trivial as motor quantities makes little to no sense. Instead, teams should be given too many options, and should have to sort through the possibilities, in order to learn about simplicity and design elegance, rather than just shoving as many motors onto the system.

[/soapbox]
Reply With Quote
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2007, 20:58
Sgraff_SRHS06's Avatar
Sgraff_SRHS06 Sgraff_SRHS06 is offline
Kappa != 1/(4Pi-Epsilon-Naut)
AKA: Steve Graff
FRC #1111 (The Power Hawks)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Ghetto D/CP, MD
Posts: 515
Sgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the roughSgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the roughSgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the roughSgraff_SRHS06 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to Sgraff_SRHS06 Send a message via Yahoo to Sgraff_SRHS06
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

You just stamped in the point I spent way too many characters trying to make! Go C7H10O4N4!!!
__________________
POWERHAWKS FORUM

2006 Chesapeake Regional Semifinalists (Thank you 614 and 339!)

UM Class of 2010!!
Reply With Quote
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2007, 21:03
Pavan Dave's Avatar
Pavan Dave Pavan Dave is offline
Busy in College
AKA: I am John Gault.
FRC #1745 (P-51 Mustangs) FRC #118 (Robonauts)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Richardson, Texas
Posts: 1,387
Pavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond reputePavan Dave has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Pavan Dave
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gdeaver View Post
The Tim Allen mentality is what I think Joe is referring to. " More Power". During the off season it seams that most teams that were doing off season projects focused on drive trains. How many teams worked on manipulator development, sensor integration, or autonomous navigation? First could control the drive train arms race with a very simple rule. Limit the energy, Make it precious and expensive. ( like what is happening in the real world). Each team is allowed 2 batteries at the competition. On practice day each team submits 2 batteries at inspection and their serial number is recorded and a permanent label is affixed. Those are the only 2 batteries allowed for the entire competition. Teams can do what ever they what with the motors and mechanisms, but the energy budget is limited. If a team gets to the finals and is forced to compete with dead batteries then they pay the price for poor energy management. This generation of kids will have to face the looming energy challenges in their life time. First can help focus them on this social issue. The other way to take the focus away from the arms race is to make the autonomous period longer and more important.

I understand exactly what you are saying with this and how much work is done off season (if any at all) on the base, but the thing everyone is missing out on is the fact that the manipulator and autonomous modes and other things change EVERY year and that certain subgroups on your team have a "static" position, meaning they have to think and come up with something completely new, while others just innovate older designs et cetera. That is why the BASE or DRIVE SYSTEM of teams is becoming more and more interesting every year from what I have seen on the forums (including archives) because the base usually stays constant or at least the framework or principles of it does.

I think the energy rule is limiting just as how you choose your motors because if you are limiting energy than you are saying you have to cut power from "A" and add it to "B" and that is similar to saying you can only use "N" amount of motors out of the number given for a certain operation (drive train, manipulation, et cetera).

Pavan.
__________________
Times change. People change. Teams change.
---
2008-Present: FRC1745, P51-Mustangs - Mentor
2005-2008: FRC118, Robonauts - Alumni
National Director of Philanthropy - Delta Epsilon Psi Fraternity, Inc.
1745 - 118 - ΔΕΨ
Reply With Quote
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-02-2007, 15:47
Danny Diaz's Avatar
Danny Diaz Danny Diaz is offline
Smooth Operator
AKA: FrankenMentor
None #0418
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 545
Danny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond reputeDanny Diaz has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Danny Diaz
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Yeah, I completely agree - it's difficult to do some of the work with Autonomous robots and sensor manipulation because it does change so rapidly from season to season, and it also depends upon the game as to whether it makes sense to invest the time in the technology. Take this year's game for instance, there is very little need for an accelerometer and/or a gyroscope - while some teams may take advantage of them to help them with some of their autonomous actions, the green light and the camera are all you really need to create an effective autonomous (some would argue that gear tooth sensors are all you need, but I digress). This year's game also didn't really need those sensors for in-game use, so for the most part they were played with and then set aside.

A lot of the responsibility for getting teams involved with the more advanced control system design is in the Game Design Committee. If they came up with a game that relied heavily on a particular type of sensor (or sensor fusion) then teams would embrace it. For instance the camera was a huge part of last year's game, the accelerometers were huge the year they had teeter-totters, and this year you've got ... nothing, really. I mean, you have 2 light sources which allows you to play with tracking/identifying multiple lights, but it isn't even mildly critical to the success of a robot. As far as I'm concerned the only "cool thing" they brought out this year was the lifting of the robots, and that doesn't even impact my controls team... though I must admit we did use the extra time this year to have a little bit more fun with our control system!

-Danny
__________________
Danny Diaz
Former Lead Technical Mentor, FRC 418
Reply With Quote
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-02-2007, 15:59
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,643
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Danny, I couldn't disagree with you more. Sensors will be vital during all phases of the game this year. Especially when trying to acquire and place tubes on the far side of the rack, sensor aided systems are going to be a huge advantage. 116 is using more sensors on our robot, particularly our maniuplator, than we ever have (at least to my knowledge). A total of 10 sensors may see use during our matches this year, and most will still be used during teleoperated mode. At one point we may even have automatic alignment software fully functional, so that we can align directly with a spider foot on the far side of the rack.
Sensor integration and navigation software are aspects that can be worked with over the summer to a certain degree, but not nearly to the extent as drivetrains. Because we don't know if we're going to have the camera, or an IR beacon, or any other kind of "target" next year, certain sensor specifics are really a risk to spend a lot of time developing during the off-season. Same with certain navigation frameworks (this year having a field element that changes placement between matches made navigation software harder).
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-02-2007, 16:35
Duke_of_Hazard's Avatar
Duke_of_Hazard Duke_of_Hazard is offline
FD3S>Z28>All
FRC #0233 (The Pink Team)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Rockledge, FL
Posts: 47
Duke_of_Hazard has a spectacular aura aboutDuke_of_Hazard has a spectacular aura about
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Like the original poster said, a reason for this escalation is because of FIRST game designs.

I think this is in fact the main reason.

Take this year's game, for example. Rack'n'Rolls main scoring device is ONE device, in the middle of the field. Most of the gameplay SHOULD happen nearby it, therefor not that much movement and a robot that can keep where he wants to be is paramount. Sadly, i think FIRST made a slight error in point values with the bonus, which makes creating a robot that in no way plays a scoring game until the end an actually viable(and very sadly, winning) solution. So, what would the builders of this robot do with the rest of the time? DEFEND!!! against those teams that make a robot which actually plays during the match. and since those teams made a robot that is not 100% geared and weighted for defense, they most likely wont be able to out-class the defense machine.

the point I'm trying to reach is....If robots with pushing power were not useful, ppl wouldn't make them, would they?

Just my 2 cents.
__________________

"I drift not because it is a quicker way around a corner, but it is the most exciting way" - Keiichi Tsuchiya
"...and remember, don't be an Initial D-ouche, Drift Responsibly" - Me, after showing a few members Initial D

The next statement I make is true. The last statement I made was false.
Pink Team Awards (Click it, you know you want to)
Base Driver 2k7!
Attending : Krunch Off-Season?

Last edited by Duke_of_Hazard : 23-02-2007 at 16:41.
Reply With Quote
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-02-2007, 16:55
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,140
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 114ManualLabor View Post
I personally believe that the issue lies in the lack of creativity required to move about the field.
I think Manual Labor is on to something here. Drive systems have had a chance to be perfected over the past few years due to a relatively similar playing surface each year.

I agree with everyone here who says no more restrictions

What I do agree with is making these perfected drive systems at least partially obsolete.

6wd has seen an incredible jump in popularity over the past few years. Why not make a game in which 6wd and other common systems work, but which aren't the best style for the game.

We've seen many many different types of manipulators over the years because of the different game pieces. Why not translate that to the field and drivetrains? Force teams to innovate to get a competitive edge
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-02-2007, 17:09
Robert Cawthon's Avatar
Robert Cawthon Robert Cawthon is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 275
Robert Cawthon is a splendid one to beholdRobert Cawthon is a splendid one to beholdRobert Cawthon is a splendid one to beholdRobert Cawthon is a splendid one to beholdRobert Cawthon is a splendid one to beholdRobert Cawthon is a splendid one to beholdRobert Cawthon is a splendid one to behold
Cool Re: Drive Systems... ...The FIRST Arms Race?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey Balint View Post
I completley agree with Tom on this one. There are so many of these new off the shelf parts every year, that teams see, and instantly say "Oh, thats different, lets use it, its spose to work great." When in reality they have no idea what to actually do with it. I've seen teams ruin shifters and wheels and so many objects by not knowing how to control them/program/use/install them. I would much rather see teams design their own parts, possibly using the ideas of others(granted they understand them). These companies who do mass produce these parts, should include more drawings, and more information to help teams understand the use of the parts.
Some of us rely on "off the shelf" parts. We are a team that has a hack saw, drill press, ruler and a lot of ideas. We do not have the equipment needed to make individual parts. Our high school doesn't even have a metal shop. It would be impossible for us to make a transmission, for example, so we either use the one in the kit or purchase one from a manufacturer. Last year we used 4 motors because we designed primarily for defence. (It was our rookie year and felt that trying to design for using the camera may have been above our abilities.) This year we elected, once again, to go with 4 motors, not for defence but rather to have the ability to climb ramps if it is necessary. Sure, we would love to manufacture our own equipment, but it ain't gonna happen.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
paper: Omnidirectional Drive Systems Ian Mackenzie Technical Discussion 2 28-05-2006 14:22
Drive Systems Alex Cormier Technical Discussion 3 11-01-2005 16:07
FIRST impacting the presidential race? Tom Bottiglieri Rumor Mill 5 03-11-2004 18:04
Drive Systems Sachiel7 Technical Discussion 6 24-03-2003 16:10
drive systems Greg Perkins Technical Discussion 0 13-01-2003 09:40


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi