|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: "Random" match Schedules
According to what Dave just told us, the results were exactly what they were designed to be. No amount of testing against the design will reveal problems with the design itself. [edit]The problem was that the design didn't match the specification, or perhaps there was never a formal specification to begin with.[/edit]
I too admit confusion, however. If you all will forgive a bit of rumor/hearsay: I heard at St. Louis from several people that the exact same issue was noticed and complained about in pre-kickoff tests, and that the complaints were dismissed because "That's the way FIRST wants it to be." Obviously the miscommunication occurred at a fundamental level. Last edited by Alan Anderson : 07-03-2007 at 08:52. Reason: distinguish between design and specificiation |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Live with Lucas" Mock Match | Tomasz Bania | General Forum | 14 | 10-04-2006 09:50 |
| "Random" Match List Generation | Sean Schuff | Regional Competitions | 32 | 01-04-2006 21:26 |
| New NEMO White Papers! "Creating a Killer Packet" and "25 Ways to Sponsor" | Jessica Boucher | Team Organization | 0 | 10-08-2005 10:55 |
| "Thunderbirds" Vs. "Team America" Which one will rule the box office? | Elgin Clock | Chit-Chat | 3 | 07-09-2004 19:53 |
| "Random" pairings | Ken Delaney | General Forum | 5 | 25-03-2002 00:38 |