Quote:
Originally Posted by 114ManualLabor
Our team is beginning a program for scouting this year where we only go to the pits of teams that we have seen perform well during matches. We then get a lot of detail on the top 12 or so, which are all the teams that our field crew looks at. This method saves time, effort, and ear pain of hearing teams talk about things their robot "can" do, and yet has never done on the field.
Most of the data that we use to pick teams comes straight from watching matches, where opinions mean nothing.
|
well thats all good but will that strategy work for teams that may just need a
defensive alliance partner in order to score alot of points.
i know that was the case for a couple of teams we played with and against
a team that scored only 2-3 ringers in a match would not be considered a great team(but they were blocked the whole match), with a decent defensive alliance partner they can score 7-8 in a row.
not criticising your strategy or anything im just saying watch out for those teams, there will be quite a few of them out there. I saw 3 here in NJ already
__________________
Favorite Phrases:
1. I like your robot, no-homo
2. "It depends how you define alone" ( Bill Clinton when being questioned about Monica Lewinsky)
if you need a hammer you use a hammer and not an oscilloscope. - Andrew Schreiber [more] 
08-03-2007, 23:22
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode