|
|
|
 Maybe this thread should be re-titled "Waiting impatiently for the 2011 hint!" since having over 100 posts doesn't seem very patient. - Joe Ross [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Maybe this thread should be re-titled "Waiting impatiently for the 2011 hint!" since having over 100 posts doesn't seem very patient. - Joe Ross [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#4
11-03-2007, 01:08
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New Bumper rule interpretation - straight from the lead inspector
yeah last year we went through two different regionals, LA and BAE, without the aluminum, but later added some one for weight. but our interpretation of the rule is that staples and glue is alright but prob. wont hold the material well enough
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Message from Chief Inspector | Russ Beavis | Rules/Strategy | 0 | 29-01-2007 15:17 |
| Military robots straight from the hobby store! | mechanicalbrain | Chit-Chat | 9 | 16-08-2005 16:03 |
| Bumper Rule <R17> | Veselin Kolev | Rules/Strategy | 10 | 23-01-2004 09:58 |
| Notes from an Inspector - Save some grief and read! | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:04 |
| Rule Interpretation | Stephen Kowski | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 23-04-2002 16:02 |
Threaded Mode