|
|
|
 Warning: this reply is just an approximation of what I meant to convey - engineers cannot possibly use just written words to express what they are thinking.
Raul - Raul [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#15
11-03-2007, 18:55
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule Discussion: Possession
I think this one of the areas that refs can easily tell when a robot is storing tubes and when a tube has been accidently placed on the robot. For my two cents, an accident should not cause a robot to fail it's mission. Common sense should prevail.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Newton Discussion | AcesPease | Championship Event | 165 | 03-05-2006 20:52 |
| If you could change one rule - eliminate ship requirement discussion | Andy Baker | General Forum | 53 | 28-10-2005 22:23 |
| Extra Discussion for Picture Discussion | Ianworld | Robot Showcase | 1 | 31-01-2005 01:28 |
| Rule G11 and Springs Rule | mtaman02 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 23-01-2004 17:43 |
| Repeated discussion | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:56 |
Threaded Mode