Go to Post It's super-ironic that a question about searching was found via searching. Whodathunk? - Brandon Martus [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 11:39
Robert Thacker-'s Avatar
Robert Thacker- Robert Thacker- is offline
2007 Autodesk Inventor Winner
FRC #0836 (RoboBees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 152
Robert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the rough
FIRST and Wikipedia

Hey, this was on Wikipedia when I typed in FIRST robotics. This is only one section of the article. What do you guys think about it?

Criticism:
Engineer centered-teams are often criticized by more student-focused teams as having an unfair advantage. Some say that since students do not get to participate as fully in the design and construction phase as they would on a student-focused team, then the students might not fully understand all that is involved, and enter engineering with a false impression of what is involved. Further, it may encourage other teams to lessen their own emphasis on student involvement, and instead shift their focus to recruiting skilled engineers to help them win.

Some people think that, in general, student centric teams perform slightly worse in competition than those with the backing of a strong mentor corps, as the teams often have designs that are less competitive than ones where the mentors played a larger role. Especially in their rookie year, teams tend to make design and construction mistakes that reduce their ability to play that year's game. Critics of the fully student-centred paradigm say that students may become discouraged and believe that they aren't cut out to be engineers, thus reducing the inspirational role of the competition. Further, students may not be exposed to a full spectrum of engineering tools or processes.
__________________
Mentor on FIRST Team 836: The RoboBees

Alumni Team 103:
2005, 2006, 2007, & 2009 National Autodesk Inventor Award Winner
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 11:52
MikeDubreuil's Avatar
MikeDubreuil MikeDubreuil is offline
Carpe diem
FRC #0125 (Nu-Trons)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 967
MikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to MikeDubreuil
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

I think that a criticism section on Wikipedia for FIRST would be a bad idea. The concept of too much professional engineer support has been beaten to death on the forum and most deemed it insignificant to the primary mission of FIRST- inspiration. I would delete such a section if it appeared on Wikipedia.

EDIT: Since it appears you have made the change already I will give you time to remove it yourself.
__________________
"FIRST is like bling bling for the brain." - Woodie Flowers
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 11:54
Robert Thacker-'s Avatar
Robert Thacker- Robert Thacker- is offline
2007 Autodesk Inventor Winner
FRC #0836 (RoboBees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 152
Robert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the rough
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

I agree, our team is considered student-oriented too. So this kind of section, I feel, does not examplify FIRST in any way.
__________________
Mentor on FIRST Team 836: The RoboBees

Alumni Team 103:
2005, 2006, 2007, & 2009 National Autodesk Inventor Award Winner
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 11:58
Kris Verdeyen's Avatar
Kris Verdeyen Kris Verdeyen is offline
LSR Emcee/Alamo Game Announcer
FRC #0118 (Robonauts)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 696
Kris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Thacker- View Post
Hey, this was on Wikipedia when I typed in FIRST robotics. This is only one section of the article. What do you guys think about it?

Criticism:
Engineer centered-teams are often criticized by more student-focused teams as having an unfair advantage. Some say that since students do not get to participate as fully in the design and construction phase as they would on a student-focused team, then the students might not fully understand all that is involved, and enter engineering with a false impression of what is involved. Further, it may encourage other teams to lessen their own emphasis on student involvement, and instead shift their focus to recruiting skilled engineers to help them win.

Some people think that, in general, student centric teams perform slightly worse in competition than those with the backing of a strong mentor corps, as the teams often have designs that are less competitive than ones where the mentors played a larger role. Especially in their rookie year, teams tend to make design and construction mistakes that reduce their ability to play that year's game. Critics of the fully student-centred paradigm say that students may become discouraged and believe that they aren't cut out to be engineers, thus reducing the inspirational role of the competition. Further, students may not be exposed to a full spectrum of engineering tools or processes.
I looked at the FIRST wikipedia page, and couldn't find any previous version of the page that had the text you posted. In any case, the text above is chock full of weasel language (unverifiable "Some people say" claims, etc, see Fox News Channel for other examples). While understanding the controversy above is important to understanding FIRST and what makes it different from other programs, it would be better explained with specific, verifiable examples, instead of being full of weasel words.

edit: Ok I found it - there's a seperate article for the FRC from FIRST. Still weaselly.
__________________
...Only a few people are awake and they live in a state of constant total amazement. -JP Shanley, Joe vs. the Volcano

Last edited by Kris Verdeyen : 17-03-2007 at 12:02.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 12:00
Adam Y.'s Avatar
Adam Y. Adam Y. is offline
Adam Y.
no team (?????)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,979
Adam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Adam Y.
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Quote:
Further, students may not be exposed to a full spectrum of engineering tools or processes.
Has anyone actually used this criticism before? Im curious because I severly doubt that you would be introduced to the full spectrum even with complete backing of a company.
__________________
If either a public officer or any one else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river. -Mill
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 12:01
Robert Thacker-'s Avatar
Robert Thacker- Robert Thacker- is offline
2007 Autodesk Inventor Winner
FRC #0836 (RoboBees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 152
Robert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the rough
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Here's the link: FIRST Robotics
__________________
Mentor on FIRST Team 836: The RoboBees

Alumni Team 103:
2005, 2006, 2007, & 2009 National Autodesk Inventor Award Winner
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 12:01
Chris2 Chris2 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Christopher
FRC #0269 (CooneyTech Robotics)
Team Role: Webmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 40
Chris2 has a spectacular aura aboutChris2 has a spectacular aura about
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

There is quite a bit of information on FIRST. If you want to find something that used to be posted on the page, you can look in the pages history.
__________________
CooneyTech Robotics Website
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 12:03
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,609
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Mike,

I think summing up the whole student/engineer centric discussion and coming down on either side of the debate is just asking for trouble. Your wording made it sound like the majority were in favor of engineer-centric teams. Near as I could tell from any of the numerous threads on the subject, there simply wasn't any consensus on the issue whatsoever. I think, instead, that most everyone agreed that the entire discussion was insignificant to the mission of FIRST and that teams should go with what works well for them and what they feel comfortable with.

To the issue at hand, I think the section could probably be trimmed and rolled into the section above it. The debate is there and real and to ignore it would be somewhat disingenuous, but I don't think it's so important as to merit an entire subsection of the article. Similar the section on the debate about collaboration. Important enough to get a mention in the section on collaboration, but doesn't need that many words covering it.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 12:27
Bongle's Avatar
Bongle Bongle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2702 (REBotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 1,069
Bongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Bongle
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

I actually wrote that section. My target audience was generally rookie teams with little connection to other teams and not knowing what to expect. It may be a smaller issue to the self-selected audience of veteran FIRSTers on CD, but to a rookie team a trimmed-down portion may be useful.

On my first team in our rookie year, we were just floored at the amount of engineer support other teams had. We thought they were bending the rules, even outright cheating. Having an article subsection explain it would have been useful at the time, since we were completely unaware of any reason or rationale for it. We always thought "high school competition" = "student built". We believed that those teams with the huge amounts of adults in their pits were only claiming to be student built while actually being adult-built, and thought that by doing that, they were outside the rules. It took a few years to realize that they were actually fully within the rules and were just doing their teaching/learning in a different fashion.

The paragraph is/was probably proportionally too large and could probably be cut to something like "many teams make use of many professional engineers to help them build their robot. This is a large part of FIRST's mission, to expose students to professional engineers, but at the same time unlevels the playing field.".

Quote:
Has anyone actually used this criticism before? Im curious because I severly doubt that you would be introduced to the full spectrum even with complete backing of a company.
You're certainly exposed to less, in my experience. My original team didn't use CAD for at least their first two years. All of our manufacturing was done kinda off-the-cuff: "ok, we need this piece to be 12 inches long, go cut it". No drawing, no physics tests, etc. Last year (2006) when I mentored 1281 was the first time I'd seen CAD. I went to a meeting of a team close to me this year, and they were going very seat-of-their-pants as well. I'd be very interested to sit in on the design meetings of a engineer-heavy team, just to experience the difference. Although the CD audience probably doesn't include many of them, there are lots of teams who could use a bit more exposure to the whole engineering process.

Quote:
In any case, the text above is chock full of weasel language (unverifiable "Some people say" claims, etc, see Fox News Channel for other examples). While understanding the controversy above is important to understanding FIRST and what makes it different from other programs, it would be better explained with specific, verifiable examples, instead of being full of weasel words.
I don't know any specific examples, and it wouldn't really feel right to say "team 1114 loves the engineers and here's how they do it", since I don't actually know and it is time-limited information. Like was said above, the debate IS important. Many teams can be disillusioned after getting thrashed by a professional-looking robot, and perhaps knowing the rationale of why that robot was allowed competing will help them in their next year. It is certainly unencyclopedic as it is though since, as you said, none of it is really verifiable. It'd be easy to reference individual posts on CD from a engineers vs students thread, but those aren't good references. If I were to try to improve the page again I'd probably not write it the paragraph in question.

Quote:
The concept of too much professional engineer support has been beaten to death on the forum and most deemed it insignificant to the primary mission of FIRST- inspiration. I would delete such a section if it appeared on Wikipedia.
To many teams, the marked difference in team organization that the engineer/student divide causes is a large part of the experience.

-------------------------------------------
Shorter version of this reply:
-The debate exists, very strongly in the case of some teams
-Since the debate IS part of the FIRST experience, it should be mentioned
-The section in question could probably be shortened, headline changed to 'debate', or put at a higher level such that it doesn't look like it is criticism of FIRST (as it never was), but rather pros/cons about the ends of the student/mentor spectrum.

And to try to turn this thread into something positive:
PLEASE ADD TO THE ARTICLE. If you know verifiable FIRST history, information about their mission, how games are planned, regionals organized, their finances, their sponsors, ANYTHING. Add to the article so it isn't full of filler stuff like the debate over students/engineers and collaboration.

Last edited by Bongle : 17-03-2007 at 12:46.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 20:29
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

While I believe the article should mention that the debate does exist, the way it is worded now seems biased. And to totally ignore it from the article would be even worse. The best way would be to state that the debate does exist (I wouldn't call it criticism), and state both sides of the issue.

Debate:
When it comes to fulfilling the "inspiration" of FIRST, the issue is purposely left open by FIRST for FRC teams to decide themselves. A vast majority of teams are a combination of student and engineer driven, but there are some teams that are strongly tipped in one direction and not the other.

As such, there is often debate among the FIRST community on which method (student- versus engineer-driven) is best for inspiring students and fulfilling the mission of FIRST. While there have been strong arguments made for both cases, a common consensus can never be reached.

The official position of FIRST on the issue has been to leave the issue to individual teams to decide which is best to inspire their own students.

[note: I would possibly include a few links to ChiefDelphi forum threads as references for this section, especially on the debate parts.]

As we have found before in the past in many discussions here on CD, there is no right or wrong answer to this question. If a strong engineer-based team inspires students just as well as a student-driven team, then so be it, even if they use radically different methods of doing so.

The final product, the inspiration, it all that matters. Awards and championships are just bling.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 21:18
Wedge34's Avatar
Wedge34 Wedge34 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0868 (TechHOUNDS)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 25
Wedge34 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Thacker- View Post
Hey, this was on Wikipedia when I typed in FIRST robotics. This is only one section of the article. What do you guys think about it?

Criticism:
Engineer centered-teams are often criticized by more student-focused teams as having an unfair advantage. Some say that since students do not get to participate as fully in the design and construction phase as they would on a student-focused team, then the students might not fully understand all that is involved, and enter engineering with a false impression of what is involved. Further, it may encourage other teams to lessen their own emphasis on student involvement, and instead shift their focus to recruiting skilled engineers to help them win.

Some people think that, in general, student centric teams perform slightly worse in competition than those with the backing of a strong mentor corps, as the teams often have designs that are less competitive than ones where the mentors played a larger role. Especially in their rookie year, teams tend to make design and construction mistakes that reduce their ability to play that year's game. Critics of the fully student-centred paradigm say that students may become discouraged and believe that they aren't cut out to be engineers, thus reducing the inspirational role of the competition. Further, students may not be exposed to a full spectrum of engineering tools or processes.
Im from 868 TechHounds, we are a student based team with 99% of our bot designed and built by students. I feel as if we performed higher than most engineer based teams. Our design is also very unorthodox and creative. I feel it is the most efficient picker and placer I have seen. It does make me sad walking through the pits and seeing many highly regarded teams with not a single student working on the bot, all mentors.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 21:57
meatmanek meatmanek is offline
Programmer/physicist/mathematician
FRC #0868 (TechHounds)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 142
meatmanek is a splendid one to beholdmeatmanek is a splendid one to beholdmeatmanek is a splendid one to beholdmeatmanek is a splendid one to beholdmeatmanek is a splendid one to beholdmeatmanek is a splendid one to beholdmeatmanek is a splendid one to behold
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Folks, this thread should probably stop pretty soon. If we don't, two things will happen:

1. We'll get into the Great FIRST Debate again. Everybody hates these, because they just decrease good will between teams.

2. We'll start debating how the Wikipedia article should be written. This should be reserved for the talk page

Another caution: Please be good Wikipedians. Don't get the article moderated.
__________________
Real programmers use vim.

Last edited by meatmanek : 17-03-2007 at 22:01. Reason: FIRST is an acronym, needs to be capitalized. I really should read my post through before posting.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 22:26
Cody Carey's Avatar
Cody Carey Cody Carey is offline
,':-)
AKA: C. Carey
FRC #0306 (CRT)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Corry, PA
Posts: 1,137
Cody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond reputeCody Carey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cody Carey Send a message via Yahoo to Cody Carey
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Why do we have to make this debate publicly available? If you go to the Battlebots Wiki page, they don't have any civil debates posted... and I think posting one may scare some people away.


I guess what I really think is that this particular subject just doesn't need to be addressed. It is way too specific. When people (or I at least) look at a Wiki page for an organization, I don't expect to see their internal affairs posted.
Instead of waisting time on that, why don't we expand the Team organization section with tips on how to start a team, and people to contact if interested, or even add a section entirely devoted to helping new teams be started. There are a lot better uses of our time than making an argument any larger than it needs to be.

-OK,I suppose there are a lot better uses of our time than arguing about the perspective taken when trying to enlarge and already over sized argument about engineers Vs. students as well; but who's counting?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2007, 22:46
Robert Thacker-'s Avatar
Robert Thacker- Robert Thacker- is offline
2007 Autodesk Inventor Winner
FRC #0836 (RoboBees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 152
Robert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the roughRobert Thacker- is a jewel in the rough
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

As I see it, people have the resources they need to do physics tests and teach themselves programs, and make a great robot. People have the internet. People can go online and watch videos to how professionals do it. If people are "student-oriented" then the student should take it as an obligation to teach him/herself everything he/she may need to know. Some people will tell themselves "well, I have no mentor to show me" then go learn it!

Look at me! I had no one to teach me Autodesk Inventor. I learned that program over the summer, I spent my whole time learning that program and talking to people with programs to what to do. I made emails; I looked at other teams that submitted entries. I am the one that leads the design crew and we are COMPLETELY student-oriented (just the CAD team). And look at us; we won two years in a row.

So no one can sit there and tell me there stories of no mentors, b/c I don't buy it, to be honest. I believe people use it as an excuse to not commit to the process. It's about passion, drive, motivation, and heart to carry on what you learn to the next generation!
__________________
Mentor on FIRST Team 836: The RoboBees

Alumni Team 103:
2005, 2006, 2007, & 2009 National Autodesk Inventor Award Winner
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-03-2007, 10:12
Bongle's Avatar
Bongle Bongle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2702 (REBotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 1,069
Bongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Bongle
Re: FIRST and Wikipedia

Does anyone know where I can get a source for this comment?
Quote:
The official position of FIRST on the issue has been to leave the issue to individual teams to decide which is best to inspire their own students.
Because that whole paragraph is probably the best handling of the issue. No weasel words, and it has a citeable sentence about FIRST's rules.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FIRST on Wikipedia Technology Portal Jeff Waegelin General Forum 5 12-06-2006 07:52
Let's improve the wikipedia page about FIRST Bongle General Forum 12 03-05-2006 08:08
Wikipedia Team List adodge General Forum 1 12-02-2006 18:39
Wikipedia article buss General Forum 3 11-01-2006 20:03
Wikipedia FIRST article: HELP Kaelia Chit-Chat 4 13-03-2004 15:49


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:59.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi