Robot Cool Down Period...?

[Mike Starke]

I'm here watching the elims in the UTC Regional, and in between the finals matches, the teams received a "robot cool down period". Being in the elims at FLR, we never had this. It seemed like we barely had time to breath, before we had to start again. I was wondering if any other regionals received the cool down period.
My question is, should FIRST implement a standard period between matches in elims...? It doesn't have to be a huge amount of time, such as 3 minutes. This would allow teams to know for sure how much time would be before their next match. At FLR it seemed like we were always asking, how much time we had before the next match, to see if we had to call a time out or not.
What do you think...?

[Beth Sweet]

I definately see the reason. There are some teams who only have 2 batteries. It takes a while for those to charge, plus you don't want your electrical to overheat and make magic smoke.

[Rob Colatutto]

I agree, FLR was very rushed. A cool-down period would have been very helpful. We found our selves putting bottles of water on our CIM motors to cool them down since we had so little time between matches.

Watching a regional and competing are very different situations though. We might have had just as much time in between, its hard to judge. Does anyone have video and could pull off the downtime between matches at various regionals to compare?

[sanddrag]

Usually this is when an alliance calls a time out.

[JamesBrown]

Originally Posted by sanddrag

Usually this is when an alliance calls a time out.

In Hartford any time an alliance had to play two consecutive matches they gave them a break in between. This was in addition to the alliance time outs.

[Joe Ross]

<T19> allows for an extra minute of cool down time if you have to play back to back matches (4 minutes total).

[Daniel_LaFleur]

Originally Posted by Joe Ross

<T19> allows for an extra minute of cool down time if you have to play back to back matches (4 minutes total).

They were giving 5 minutes between each match at Hartford.

And I think it's a good idea

[Starke]

Originally Posted by Joe Ross

<T19> allows for an extra minute of cool down time if you have to play back to back matches (4 minutes total).

I am glad that this is a rule that exits. It allows the teams to take their time and get ready for the next match. You will especially need it at championship, for the last minute run back to the pits

[Pavan Dave]

Actually I like these cool down periods. I wish they were a bit longer, but during Bayou when 118 had 4 back to back to back to back matches, I am glad the drivers at least had a bit of a break.

(PS. Did anyone notice that on the Bayou Regional statistics page it only lists 3 matches in the semifinals instead of 4?)

[The Lucas]

Originally Posted by Pavan

(PS. Did anyone notice that on the Bayou Regional statistics page it only lists 3 matches in the semifinals instead of 4?)

It is the same way for the Midwest regional (5 finals matches). It only lists decisive Elim matches, never ties. Probably has to do with how the scoring software is written.

[Joe Ross]

Originally Posted by The Lucas

It is the same way for the Midwest regional (5 finals matches). It only lists decisive Elim matches, never ties. Probably has to do with how the scoring software is written.

Section 9.4.5 specifies that tied matches are replayed, so the tie score gets replaced with the new score.

[Protronie]

Just a suggestion from any outsider looking in. Why don't you pack a small fan with you and use the fan between matches to cool down your motors?

[redbarron]

1270 definitely could have used these cool down periods in the finals at Florida. We pulled it off but it was definitely hectic because when the match was over they were telling us to hurry up while we were walking to reset/ refresh batteries. I also see the point about battery charging. We have a box that charges 4 at a time and holds 10 and whenever we get to the finals we have all 10 charged and bring them all to the field to share among the alliance. This year we stored them in 86s full toolbox robot cart.

[Tom Line]

I would definitely like to a standardized time between matches for the eliminations round.

In one case in Detroit, we had to make a program change because our arm was loose on the set screws - but they started our next match too quickly - perhaps 4 minutes after our last one ended.

We ran that match in manual, and during the match our opponent damaged his arm. Then, in between, before we got to play our final match (we were tied one-one) they had everyone doing line dancing on the field.

Gracious Professionalism says I should probably keep my mouth shut - but I have to admit it was frustrating for them to get the time (though accidental) to fix their arm when we didn't have the time to fix ours in the previous matchup.

Standardize it at whatever time you like to make it fair - short or long. It just needs to be consistent.

[Jeremiah Johnson]

Originally Posted by The Lucas

It is the same way for the Midwest regional (5 finals matches). It only lists decisive Elim matches, never ties. Probably has to do with how the scoring software is written.

There also wasn't much of a "cool-down period" between those matches. The number 1 seed alliance played 11 elimination matches. By the end, 648's motors could have been glowing red hot. I've never seen anything like it.