|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Why 26ms update rate?
Using Easy/C the necessity to think about the 26 msec from the Master is removed, the compiler lets your code run in a tight loop and simply updates the Master processor at appropriate intervals. So if next year, the Master updates every 28 msec or 22 msec instead - who cares?
With the provision of the Easy/C (WPILIB)Timer() functions, it unnecessary (IMHO) for code to base any calculations on the 26 msec interval, or programmers to be concerned about same. Kevin's explanation of 'why' is clear enough, and it is clear enough that the robots work just fine at this rate. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why should I update my 2006 code? | amateurrobotguy | Programming | 4 | 09-01-2007 21:09 |
| Rate my sig/avatar | BadKarma | Chit-Chat | 15 | 01-02-2006 16:14 |
| ADXRS300EB Rate Gyro | rmeenaks | Electrical | 18 | 05-04-2004 22:37 |
| Yaw Rate Sensor | gburlison | Electrical | 23 | 21-01-2004 09:08 |
| Yaw Rate Sensors | dense | Technical Discussion | 4 | 10-01-2002 08:28 |