2007 best tube scorers

[smurfgirl]

Originally Posted by wpdrummer

1369 is a dynamyte robot, but I havn't seen it at a competition.

Hey- 1124 named our robot "Dynamite"! I've never heard anyone else describe a robot as "dynamite" before.

[Po-ser]

I have a test tomorrow, so I'm not going to go through 8 pages to see if they've been mentioned, but I'll offer up team 555, Montclair Robotics. We competed with them at the NJ Regional and their grabber really impressed me when I saw it in action-- some of the reasoning behind the engineering inspiration awards this year has been for creative ways to pick up tubes, and they had a pretty nifty device figured out for human loading:

http://www.montclair.k12.nj.us/schoo...555/index.html

The lifter was designed like a forklift to go from the bottom spider legs to the top and then flip over the top to human load, if I remember correctly. I definitely thought it was one of the coolest designs for a tube grabber. I don't think their stats were the greatest at the regional, which is why I'll add 25 and 103 to my list, but I still thought they had the coolest bot there.

[Beth Sweet]

Hahaha, oh yes, we're quite a secret society...

For those at WMR, feel free to ask stats at any time. I'll try to get the excel database from Pat tonight. I have the one updated through Friday, but I don't have Saturday's data on there.

(Note: We didn't scout during the tournament, so my info will only be from Qualifications)

[KTorak]

I'm dieing to see the GLR and BMR data...

[Dan Petrovic]

Originally Posted by KTorak

I'm dieing to see the GLR and BMR data...

I have data from BMR, but it's only from Thursday and Friday and it's in my car.

Which is with my mom at work.

So! I can't do it right now, but I will eventually.

[Joe Ross]

I looked at the MARRS Data and extracted the best tube scorers at Wisconsin and Buckeye. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=56258

Here are the best scorers from Wisconsin:

1736	3.7
537	2.55
1732	2.15
2052	2.09
1623	2

And from Buckeye:

1038	4.13
494	4
1126	3.67
451	3.13
70	3
191	2.88
291	2.88
65	2.56
537	2.55
548	2.5

[popnbrown]

At boston: I would have to say 69, 126, 1626, 2079, thats about what I can think off. All 4 teams can put tubes on really fast and easily at least it seems.

NJ: 25, 103. Wow its been a long time, I need my memory checked.

[Beth Sweet]

Here's what I have from GLR, if you would like a listing of how your individual team did, let me know, but because our database is over a meg, I can't upload it. Also, I looked through and I'm not sure how far through Saturday these are updated. Every team has at least through the 6th match, most through the 7 and some the 8.

Ramp Rankings			Rack Rankings	
				
TEAM #	BOTS UP RANK	TEAM #	RINGERS
57	4	1	1114	28
66	3	2	67	27
453	3	3	503	25
67	3	4	573	24
279	2	5	33	23
1213	2	6	65	23
1941	2	7	326	19
815	2	8	1015	18
548	1	9	1023	15
1188	1	10	1503	15
2137	1	11	70	14
240	1	12	201	14
1528	1	13	1504	12
33	1	14	1701	12
1	1	15	322	11
308	1	16	1674	11
1023	1	17	451	11
322	1	18	862	10
1243	1	19	815	10
469	1	20	1596	9
1549	1	21	548	8
503	1	22	494	8
2163	1	23	910	8
1711	0	24	1243	7
1322	0	25	1	7
68	0	26	448	7
494	0	27	818	7
226	0	28	1254	6
313	0	29	68	5
448	0	30	2163	5
519	0	31	1213	5
1254	0	32	308	5
280	0	33	1188	4
1504	0	34	1322	4
573	0	35	280	4
1674	0	36	1896	3
326	0	37	830	3
70	0	38	469	2
818	0	39	835	2
1189	0	40	1711	1
830	0	41	1189	1
451	0	42	1549	0
406	0	43	66	0
1286	0	44	406	0
201	0	45	894	0
1503	0	46	226	0
894	0	47	519	0
65	0	48	1528	0
903	0	49	453	0
1596	0	50	470	0
910	0	51	2137	0
1701	0	52	440	0
1015	0	53	57	0
1896	0	54	313	0
440	0	55	1941	0
470	0	56	279	0
1114	0	57	903	0
835	0	58	240	0
862	0	59	1286	0

[KTorak]

Is this ranking done based on avg points earned per match, average ringers scored per match, or some other method?

[Beth Sweet]

My apologies. The rank is for the top robot in each category. On the right side, it is for the top ringer scorers and on the left, the top ramp bots. It just lists them in order so that when our picker goes out, he knows what order to go in. The numbers are for total ringers scored in qualifyings and total number of robots that were lifted by that team in qualifyings.

[Dan 1038]

Originally Posted by Joe Ross

I looked at the MARRS Data and extracted the best tube scorers at Wisconsin and Buckeye.

We were the best scorer at Buckeye? How cool is that! Thanks Joe...

[sloteera]

Brazilian Team #1860 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko0BRuWPyiI

In this match, we only place 4 rings because our sensor was defective, but generally, we placed 5 and keeper.

[cire]

Originally Posted by Beth Sweet

Here's what I have from GLR, if you would like a listing of how your individual team did, let me know, but because our database is over a meg, I can't upload it. Also, I looked through and I'm not sure how far through Saturday these are updated. Every team has at least through the 6th match, most through the 7 and some the 8.

Ramp Rankings			Rack Rankings	
				
TEAM #	BOTS UP RANK	TEAM #	RINGERS
57	4	1	1114	28
66	3	2	67	27
453	3	3	503	25
67	3	4	573	24
279	2	5	33	23
1213	2	6	65	23
1941	2	7	326	19
815	2	8	1015	18
548	1	9	1023	15
1188	1	10	1503	15
2137	1	11	70	14
240	1	12	201	14
1528	1	13	1504	12
33	1	14	1701	12
1	1	15	322	11
308	1	16	1674	11
1023	1	17	451	11
322	1	18	862	10
1243	1	19	815	10
469	1	20	1596	9
1549	1	21	548	8
503	1	22	494	8
2163	1	23	910	8
1711	0	24	1243	7
1322	0	25	1	7
68	0	26	448	7
494	0	27	818	7
226	0	28	1254	6
313	0	29	68	5
448	0	30	2163	5
519	0	31	1213	5
1254	0	32	308	5
280	0	33	1188	4
1504	0	34	1322	4
573	0	35	280	4
1674	0	36	1896	3
326	0	37	830	3
70	0	38	469	2
818	0	39	835	2
1189	0	40	1711	1
830	0	41	1189	1
451	0	42	1549	0
406	0	43	66	0
1286	0	44	406	0
201	0	45	894	0
1503	0	46	226	0
894	0	47	519	0
65	0	48	1528	0
903	0	49	453	0
1596	0	50	470	0
910	0	51	2137	0
1701	0	52	440	0
1015	0	53	57	0
1896	0	54	313	0
440	0	55	1941	0
470	0	56	279	0
1114	0	57	903	0
835	0	58	240	0
862	0	59	1286	0

Thank you Beth, this is just another show of proof that seed ranks can be all about luck. Ranked 8 in best tube scorers, but 45th seed.

[Dylan Gramlich]

Originally Posted by Dan 1038

We were the best scorer at Buckeye? How cool is that! Thanks Joe...

yeah you guys were from our count also #1 and #3 make a good pair if u ask me

[Greg Ross]

Originally Posted by cire

Thank you Beth, this is just another show of proof that seed ranks can be all about luck. Ranked 8 in best tube scorers, but 45th seed.

Yep. And that's why it's important to scout rather than simply to look to the top seeds when you do your alliance selection: The qualities you need in your alliance partner may not be measured by the seeding algorithm.