|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Las Vegas broadcast
It's back!
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Las Vegas broadcast
Yep! And for the guy from 1902, I just watched your team play another match (against 254 again) and you placed eleven tubes- a keeper, nine ringers, and a spoiler.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Las Vegas broadcast
Wow...I just saw the 1902 vs 254 match...that was awesome
and I have one more word to add...PINK...are these guys for real??? YOU BET THEY ARE |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Las Vegas broadcast
Quote:
In the 3:24 PM Match 1885's FlatCat & Pink are on the same alliances. Score is 170 to zip, 1885's FlatCat & Pink & Ally (989) win. In the 4:06 PM Match 1885's FlatCat & Pink are on opposing alliances. Score is 64 to 16, FlatCat & Allies (815 & 1425) win. Maybe there is a pattern here? ![]() ![]() On the other hand... The 3:24 Match is Friday's High Score and only one other score is close to it (Pink's previous match with allies 2034 and 1110). Go Pink! Go purple FlatCat! Blake |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Las Vegas broadcast
I just watched match 66 I believe...it was 1902 vs. somebody, and 1902 got flipped in the match. I'm happy to say that 1902 was able to pull out that win, because what happened to them is not right. If your ramps deploy early, DO NOT USE them to play defense, it isn't right, and refs are not calling it. I just felt i needed to say something because that was blaitantly a wrong thing to do.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Las Vegas | mandraque | Regional Competitions | 1 | 21-01-2007 13:33 |
| Las Vegas info? | AKnotts | Regional Competitions | 0 | 20-01-2006 15:31 |
| Las Vegas Update | SteveO | Regional Competitions | 31 | 09-04-2005 16:08 |
| Viva Las Vegas!!1! | Alaina | Regional Competitions | 8 | 19-10-2004 19:34 |
| Las Vegas Regional??? | Lavapicker | Regional Competitions | 5 | 13-07-2004 23:29 |