2007 best tube scorers

[slickguy2007]

Team #:         Sum of tubes scored:
25                               24
836                             20
103                             20
75                              17
1403                           16
177                             16 
1218                           15
359                             15
237                             14
716                             13
293                             12
223                             12
375                             10
341                             9
1672                            7
816                             7
2016                            6
1807                            6
11                               6 
555                              6
486                              6
1302                            5 
613                              5
88                                4

This is the info that I have from the NJ regional. It might be a little off, but this is about 90% accurate.

[slickguy2007]

[quote=slickguy2007;607837]

Team #:         Sum of tubes scored:
88                              28
126                            26
1403                           23
69                              23
121                             22
1626                           21 
1100                           19
125                             17
2079                           16
1350                           16

This is our scouting info from Boston. Once again, I can't guarantee that it is 100% correct, but its pretty close. Enjoy.

[EmilioM]

Wow. Lots of good offensive robots at Boston, huh?

[JoelGoering]

[quote=slickguy2007;607841]

Originally Posted by slickguy2007

Team #:         Sum of tubes scored:
88                              28
126                            26
1403                           23
69                              23
121                             22
1626                           21 
1100                           19
125                             17
2079                           16
1350                           16

This is our scouting info from Boston. Once again, I can't guarantee that it is 100% correct, but its pretty close. Enjoy.

Just one question, if you look at the NJ results, 88 only put on 4 tubes. Then in Boston they get 28. I don't know about you, but that seems fishy to me. Was a scouter putting down tubes for an entire alliance, and not just one specific robot? Maybe 88 got that much better, I didn't see either regionals so I don't know, but I just wanted to point that out.

[Nuttyman54]

[quote=JoelGoering;607987]

Originally Posted by slickguy2007

Just one question, if you look at the NJ results, 88 only put on 4 tubes. Then in Boston they get 28. I don't know about you, but that seems fishy to me. Was a scouter putting down tubes for an entire alliance, and not just one specific robot? Maybe 88 got that much better, I didn't see either regionals so I don't know, but I just wanted to point that out.

I have no trouble believing that 88 put up that many tubes at Boston, so they may just have been having problems at NJ

[Vogel648]

Do these scores include elimination matches? I assume that they would not but I just hadn't seen it clarified.

[slickguy2007]

Originally Posted by Vogel648

Do these scores include elimination matches? I assume that they would not but I just hadn't seen it clarified.

Actually these statistics are only from qualifying matches. We don't scout during finals because we want the team to enjoy the fruits of their hard work (the team making it into finals).

Originally Posted by JoelGoering

Just one question, if you look at the NJ results, 88 only put on 4 tubes. Then in Boston they get 28. I don't know about you, but that seems fishy to me. Was a scouter putting down tubes for an entire alliance, and not just one specific robot? Maybe 88 got that much better, I didn't see either regionals so I don't know, but I just wanted to point that out.

88 got much better in Boston. I remember thinking the same thing, but I was assured by one of the scouts (who saw 88 in both nj and boston) that this was accurate.

[popnbrown]

88 definitely did much better in Boston than NJ. I was quite surprised too. The elimination matches at Boston were crazy. So many tubes were going up, especially the winners 69, 126 and 125. They were on a roll

[Astronouth7303]

Wow, the results are quite wide, here. A few teams seem to come up a lot, but it also seems to vary from region to region. I guess we'll see at nats, eh?

[lukevanoort]

Heres the Palmetto regional top ten as of Friday by # of tubes scored (we didn't collect data on Saturday)

Rank    Team Number    # of Tubes    Avg per match    Final rank
1.          1626           33            4.125           4
2.          832            26            3.250           13
3.          1251           25            3.571           1
4.          1746           23            2.875           10
5.          342            22            2.750           27
6.          343            22            2.750           5
7.          34             21            3.00            23
8.          587            21            2.625           45
9.          1249           18            2.571           16
10.         1319           17            2.125           2

[Spider-Man]

Originally Posted by lukevanoort

Heres the Palmetto regional top ten as of Friday by # of tubes scored (we didn't collect data on Saturday)

Rank    Team Number    # of Tubes    Avg per match    Final rank
1.          1626           33            4.125           4
2.          832            26            3.250           13
3.          1251           25            3.571           1
4.          1746           23            2.875           10
5.          342            22            2.750           27
6.          343            22            2.750           5
7.          34             21            3.00            23
8.          587            21            2.625           45
9.          1249           18            2.571           16
10.         1319           17            2.125           2

Nice to see 34 rocketing up the ringers . Congrats to my alma mater team for the Imagery award and their awesome robot.

[LightWaves1636]

Only one match, an alliance made it past 100, they were so close to a full eight, but the defense playing here at Colorado was done really well.

[Guy_E]

I think that team 1574 should be considered as a really heavy scorer. I think we have an average of almost 5 tubes per match, with a maximum of 7.

Here you can see some videos of us in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6kWTSkCrI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk7kzLBvNoE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaOdriTTfUY

[Jay Trzaskos]

I don't know if anybody has mentioned them yet but 234, Cyber Blue, is one of the fastest teams I have seen since I first saw 1114. I turned away from the field while watching one of their quals at Long Island, and when I turned back 20 seconds later, they had put up three more tubes. I credit these guys and girls with our Long Island win, we couldn't have done it without them and their amazing offensive machine.

[Squirrel Lord]

I am only a little offended that my team, 1425, has been neglected so far...
We went undefeated scoring tubes throughout the Las Vegas Regional, including tough qualifying matches against such teams as 254 and 233
In San Diego we were second only to 330 in average rings. We were regularly defended in the elimination tournament at Vegas, but still scored 3 - 5 rings...
You might want to check us out at: http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv...5&sbutt=search
Really, we're good