|
|
|
 Because when you build the people and the team, building the robot comes much easier. - Koko Ed [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Because when you build the people and the team, building the robot comes much easier. - Koko Ed [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#24
03-04-2007, 12:23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Picking alliances
One point to make about Atlanta. Our team will be overworked since we have an FRC team (180) and an FVC team (3228) at the events. FVC is going to be a monster to scout. The current team list has 69 teams, but there are supposed to be some international teams that are not present on the list yet. The website says "almost 100 teams". They are not breaking us into different divisions like FRC.
Scouting (the way we scout for FRC) will not be possible, so we will just do our best. With other teams in the same situation, I will probably put together a promotional flyer for our FVC team. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| declining alliances | geowasp | General Forum | 6 | 27-03-2006 18:13 |
| [OCCRA]: Top Ranking Teams Picking Alliances | Lisa Perez | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 15-11-2004 20:31 |
| alliances | archiver | 1999 | 49 | 23-06-2002 22:43 |
| Tri-Alliances? | archiver | 1999 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:16 |
| 3 Team Alliances | archiver | 1999 | 5 | 23-06-2002 22:13 |
Threaded Mode