|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Team numbers were permanently assigned in 1998, as I recall, and rookies in the 1999 season were numbered sequentially based on the order of their registration. That formula has varied a bit since then, but that's largely how it's been worked since.
The oldest teams in FIRST include 45, 126, 190, and 191. There may be more that are still left, but those are the folks that stick out in my mind. 250 was in it from the beginning as well, but they recently split into two teams, I believe, and only one of those teams represents the original school -- team 20, perhaps. The lowest assigned numbers are 1, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 16, I think. Last edited by Madison : 04-04-2007 at 21:43. Reason: A 9 is nothing if not a misplaced 6. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
What about the Bomb Squad (Formerly BBS)? Team 16.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
That's what I meant by 19 -- sorry about the typo.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Team 5, the Robocards. I think are still around, but their web-site hasn't been updated since 2006.
edit: yep, according to the above link. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
I thought I saw the Juggernauts (1) signed up for a regional this year....I suppose I could be wrong.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
I know they were at Lone Star.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Team 20 has been around since 1992.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lowest Number
I searched an hour and a half for this list I made ages ago (it got to the point where I probably would've been better off searching for my ancient yearbooks). It's 100% accurate up to and including 2002 (proof that I made this list ages ago
). Everything 2003 and beyond has been addended to the list through the years a few times, and therefore may not be 100% correct (it's still pretty accurate though).
Now: ::Copies, Pastes, Saves, goes to bed:: |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Quote:
Last edited by GaryVoshol : 05-04-2007 at 07:14. Reason: More corrections |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Quote:
. So you're right on the 1980/1981 change (and the saved list now reflects that). I'm not so sure on the other two changes though. I could've sworn they stopped at 1500 intentionally in 2004, therefore begining in 2005 at 1501. My list also gets a bit muddy on the 2003 cutoff/2004 start; I believe I tacked that on the year after the fact, and haven't been able to find anything more accurate since (we've apparently lost a lot of teams from that year). If you could show me a source or something on those two changes, it'd be appreciated. ![]() We WILL get this list accurate! ![]() |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
See team data from the FIRST site. For example, https://my.usfirst.org/myarea/index....info&team=1498
Just change the team number at the end of the line, and you'll get any team you want. I knew 1999/2000 wasn't the current split, and thought the 1500/1501 was a little too "convenient", if you know what I mean, so I went looking. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Quote:
At least I'll have more sleep tonight... ![]() |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
Huh, when I went to that link, it showed two team #4s. Now that is funny!
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Lowest Number
https://my.usfirst.org/myarea/index....nu=false&event shows you everyone.
(As always, thanks to Joe Ross for showing me how to do this) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lowest seed to win a regional | Cody Carey | General Forum | 12 | 02-04-2006 22:34 |
| Lowest Budget?? | Moloch | Regional Competitions | 13 | 28-03-2005 00:21 |
| Number 2 | srjjs | General Forum | 15 | 24-01-2003 08:27 |
| Number of bins? | Rob Ribaudo | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 05-01-2003 09:50 |
| 3 is the number and the number shall be 3... | Joe Johnson | General Forum | 21 | 03-12-2001 17:08 |