Official 2007 Championship Divisions

[EricH]

Curie is stacked pretty well. This means that Curie will most likely not win this year either.
67, 1114, 330, 118, 16, 48, 60, 234...the list goes on. (lots of other good teams, these just seem to be the best few--no particular order.)


It looks like the "randomizer" was applied to division assignments. I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not.

[Joel J]

Man 1114 and 330 together... kinda like 1114 and 469 last year. Could be amazing.

Someone needs guts to call the finals for these divisions.

[ZachKahn]

What are the power houses for Galileo?

[EricLeifermann]

24 45 56 65 70 116 191 217 237 1126 2056 and more, for Galileo.

[slickguy2007]

27
47
71
85
95
125
175
179
233
254
293
494
555
1302
1403

Archimedes should be fun.

[Tom Bottiglieri]

Originally Posted by slickguy2007

27
47
71
85
95
125
175
179
233
254
293
494
555
1302
1403

Archimedes should be fun.

Maybe we'll be against each other another 4 times, Aroon.


You can check this for a temporary scouting fix: http://www.thebluealliance.net/cd/divisionparse.php

[Andy Grady]

Anyone else look at Curie and cringe in horror at the alliances that could come out of that division? Talk about stacked.

Newton is no walk in the park either.

[Spider-Man]

Originally Posted by Andy Grady

Anyone else look at Curie and cringe in horror at the alliances that could come out of that division? Talk about stacked.

Newton is no walk in the park either.

There are definitely some powerhouses there (and in each of the 4 divisions). I think that Curie may have the best chance of 3 autonomous scores on an alliance with 67, 365, and 1114. If that alliance does come up--and I think it has a good chance with the ABC team number split--I'd be real interested to see what happens in autonomous.

[The Lucas]

Originally Posted by Spider-Man

There are definitely some powerhouses there (and in each of the 4 divisions). I think that Curie may have the best chance of 3 autonomous scores on an alliance with 67, 365, and 1114. If that alliance does come up--and I think it has a good chance with the ABC team number split--I'd be real interested to see what happens in autonomous.

Based on the pool split Travis posted, It looks like 67 and 365 are both in A pool and 1114 in B pool so that (dream) pairing will not happen in qualifications.

[Spider-Man]

Originally Posted by The Lucas

Based on the pool split Travis posted, It looks like 67 and 365 are both in A pool and 1114 in B pool so that (dream) pairing will not happen in qualifications.

If only you guys had waited a few days to register back in 2000...

Well, maybe when the "fix" the scheduling algorithm, we will see this alliance happen .

I think that there is still the potential for some good coordinated autonomous scoring in Curie. It could be the best division for that.

[fluffy]

Originally Posted by Spider-Man

There are definitely some powerhouses there (and in each of the 4 divisions). I think that Curie may have the best chance of 3 autonomous scores on an alliance with 67, 365, and 1114. If that alliance does come up--and I think it has a good chance with the ABC team number split--I'd be real interested to see what happens in autonomous.

we (141) got our autonomous to work almost flawlessly after the finals at WMR
...hopefully it'll work just as well at Atlanta as it did on the practice field

[Athleticgirl389]

No one has said anything about Newton... so I will... I'm happy to be with 75... they are usually pretty good

[Ashley Weed]

Galileo has 1712, too ...

"randomizer" hasn't done too bad

[IraJason]

Originally Posted by Ashley Weed

Galileo has 1712, too ...

"randomizer" hasn't done too bad

he he he he...

We're going to be looking forward to competing this year

[Jared Russell]

Galileo!

AGAIN!

Sweet.