|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Some statistics on year-to-year consistency, 2005-2007
I'm somewhat surprised that Regional Winner #4 is ranked last, unless one of my assumptions is wrong.
For a team to be #4 on the alliance, they would have to be a replacement team, the highest seed to not be picked. The lowest this team could be would be 25th, if the top 8 seeds all choose within the top 24. (Typically it seems to be more in the range of 16 or even lower). If they have a performance of .7, then 70% of teams perform better then them. 25/.7=35 for a typical regional where a replacement happens. Since almost all regionals are larger then 35 and replacement teams are almost always ranked better then 25th, that number doesn't seem right. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Happy New Year 2007! | Schnabel | General Forum | 27 | 03-01-2007 06:39 |
| Year course 2005 - 2006 | savage | Finding A Team | 1 | 01-08-2005 08:14 |
| what are some good strategies to use this year | ewankoff | Scouting | 8 | 04-01-2005 22:36 |
| What's easier? Last year or this year? | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 23-06-2002 23:33 |
| Last year vs. this year Fisher Price Gear | bmusser | Technical Discussion | 4 | 29-01-2002 13:24 |