|
|
|
 FIRST cannot enforce Gracious Professionalism on the participants in this program, you will have to do it on your own. - Ken Leung [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| FIRST cannot enforce Gracious Professionalism on the participants in this program, you will have to do it on your own. - Ken Leung [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#18
17-04-2007, 17:41
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Einstein?
The status of a robot as defined per 'operable' and 'inoperable' is not defined in the terms section of the rules so the ruling should.... go to the refs?
As I see the rule, I would say that that term is undefined and becomes a judgement call which is the refs responsibility to determine. I am now challenging the rules of the game in asking how is it the refs responsibility to determine whether 1 out of the 80 odd robots he or she has seen that day to be operable or not? Shouldn't that call be the call of the alliance captain? Hopping more into the frying pan, where would the ref (if left to his or her disgression) draw the line for operability? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EINSTEIN | windup zeppelin | Championship Event | 96 | 30-04-2006 23:39 |
| Einstein Division | Dave Hurt | Championship Event | 1 | 27-04-2002 14:59 |
| Einstein Database | Rick Gibbs | Championship Event | 4 | 22-04-2002 18:56 |
| Einstein | Melissa Nute | Championship Event | 22 | 22-04-2002 10:27 |
| Einstein field | Tyler Olds | 3D Animation and Competition | 5 | 29-01-2002 13:41 |
Threaded Mode