|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
I wonder how igus bushings would work for the drivetrain? just an idea...they seem to be "good stuff" and worth considering using wherever you can.
I don't see nearly enough room for electronics ![]() How much work is it to change a wheel out? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
Just a question would it be tank or skid steering.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
Every good 4+ wheel drive train has an odd number of wheels on each side. This is because the center wheel is dropped to allow the robot to "spin on a dime" because it rocks on the center
When you start pushing someone or they start pushing you, the robot basically turns into a 4 wheel drive system by falling to one side. Either the front or back wheels barely touch the ground when this happens. In your system here, you COULD drop the two sets of center wheels if you so desired (this is what team 48 did with their tank drive system) but i doubt it would rock very well on those four wheels unless you move them closer together. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
We used bushings this year and they seemed to work very well. Switching out to bearings would work but the cost would be much greater, also how thin of bearings can you buy? I am wondering because the plates are only .25" thick. I do agree that they would probably be more efficient, but honestly bushings worked so well for us and really didn't have much friction. I will definitely look into bearings though.
The total weight for the drivetrain is around 40lbs. I believe each module is about 17lbs in inventor. That weight is with motors. It uses the andymark 2 speed transmissions, and on the design as pictured the speeds are around 5fps and 12fps, but we might up the speed a little. The 2 middle wheels are lowered on each side to provide some rocking effect. There shouldn't be much problem with it turning as the middle wheels have a larger track width than the length. Essentially it is a wide 4 wheel drive base which generally doesn't have any problems. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
We used bearings for half inch shaft that were .25 thick total, and 1/16th of that was a flange, so press fitting isn't necessary. We still press fitted them for more security though...
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
Could you tell me where you got them from and how much. The thinnest I can find are 7/16". 1/4" would be perfect and would allow us to press fit them. Also why do you not like bushings? Multiple teams use them including 121 and they seem to work well. Just wondering. Thanks for your help.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
I looked at mcmaster and I saw those bearings. If I were to use bearings over bushings, they would have to be flanged, and be thinner than 1/2". Also I can't tell if the electronic thing is a joke or not but I think there's plenty of space for electronics. The controller will probably be on a second layer above the rest of the stuff.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain completed
Agree. I'm sure you are going to need more room for electronics.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 1683 8 wheel drivetrain updated | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 10 | 16-04-2007 18:08 |
| pic: 1683 Concept 8 Wheel Drive | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 16 | 16-04-2007 14:22 |
| pic: 1683 robot 2 | sdcantrell56 | Robot Showcase | 7 | 15-02-2007 21:54 |
| pic: 1683 drivetrain 1 | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 11 | 01-02-2007 11:24 |
| pic: 1683 2007 drivetrain | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 9 | 17-01-2007 17:32 |