|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Read the 1st post. | |||
| 39 |
|
6 | 3.55% |
| 67 |
|
9 | 5.33% |
| 79 |
|
7 | 4.14% |
| 233 |
|
23 | 13.61% |
| 340 |
|
13 | 7.69% |
| 375 |
|
13 | 7.69% |
| 386 |
|
5 | 2.96% |
| 910 |
|
5 | 2.96% |
| 1114 |
|
25 | 14.79% |
| 1902 |
|
57 | 33.73% |
| 1730 |
|
6 | 3.55% |
| Voters: 169. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
since the blue alliance site isn't working for me i voted for the one that stuck out in my mind the most-1902 at the florida regional they rarely missed the spider (I only remember them missing one time) they were quick and extremely efficient
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
not to brag about my own team or anything but here is a link to a video that may spark some votes out way,
http://media.putfile.com/Newton-Matc...0-Another-View AND ANOTHER VIEW http://media.putfile.com/Newton-Match-66-340 even with nasty defense from 49 robotic knights (props by the way) we scored... and we still owe those programmers a coke ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
There was a team that I saw on a practice field that actually used a sonar system to gauge where the spider legs were. Anyone have any more info on this? I can't remember the team number or anything else about it..
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
We also used a single sonar and IR senor for Spiderlegs "inbetween" lights. We use the camera to get close and the sonar and IR to finish the job. Not as high percentage as on Lighted rows. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Everyone that went to Boilermaker should know the answer to this one...1730!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
The actual link is www.thebluealliance.net but i cant edit the first post
any advise? |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I have to say that I was amazingly impressed by all of the teams on this poll. I know at first I found the way 233 let the tube out to be inefficient (every time I saw a tube touching the pvc then getting pulled back off when the gripper released a little piece of me died inside). I was so glad to see them fix that movement by Atlanta to where it smoothly let go of the tube, and it always did a great job. The same goes with how great it was seeing 79 improve as time went on. Finally, of course 1114 just.. yea, wow. I was amazingly impressed by their consistency as well. Another great mention is 148, I loved the vex model they used in testing as well (watching the 1902 and 148 vex bots chasing the scale model of the 1902 FRC bot in the pits was absolutely adorable)
In the end, and I spent awhile debating this since I usually find it to be rude to vote for your own team, I did place my vote in for 1902. The primary reason (as I ended up being an onlooker in terms of programming this year with my busy schedule) was probably more of the backend. I was amazingly proud to see the way 1902 created a very methodical vex-based system in which every sensor system was thoroughly tested before ever making a decision. Seeing in the end the programmer's making a rational choice over a pride based one as they decided to take a chance with EasyC when all of the programmers were well-versed in C was one amazing thing to see (I definitely was one of those that had trouble with that change at first). Seeing the 7 different vex bots that were designed out of parts that students donated from their own kits they had received as christmas/birthday/etc. presents was very very cool. It provided a set of tools that we were able to exchange with other teams that were trying non-camera methods (i.e. IR/Ultrasonic/etc.). So, in the end, seeing both the inside and the outside of 1902s setup this year made me step back and say "The end result is just the showcase of the amazing backend that was used to develop it as well as a plan for future years." This poll does just ask for the end result, and I feel that the process did in turn make that impression both on and off of the field. I find that as my justification to step out of my comfort bubble and make that vote. To the teams I didn't specifically point out in this post though, there isn't a single post in this thread I don't agree with so far and all of the people in the poll itself did a great job (I was curious how some teams such as 148 didn't get into this poll, they had issues in Atlanta because of lighting but their program itself was rock-solid). Great job everybody! Last edited by miketwalker : 21-04-2007 at 12:25. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
I believe they used similar sensors for their autonomous. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
ours would have been good if there weren't major differences between our practice bot and our comp bot... it led to disaster (with the kPID gains). Also, our camera's smashing in SF1 at newton didnt help much either.
in any case, i found 111's auto to be very amusing... their method was awesome |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I agree 111's autonomous was great.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
when 340 was able to score after it got knocked...that was it.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
It seemed that 1902 had theirs working perfectly... Then in every match I watched at the Championships it failed, what happened 1902? |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
During eliminations we ende up having to replace one or both of our Banebots controlling our arm several times throughout the tournament and were not able to be as accurate as we had been all year. Thanks for everyone that voted for us! The programming team spent many hours working on the robot an was a huge key to our sucess so I know they appreciate all the kind words. Last edited by Matt_Kaplan1902 : 21-04-2007 at 19:20. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Are you referring to Einstein? I think 1902, and others, had trouble with the additional lighting, although I may be wrong.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Hey all, in case you didn't get a chance to see our autonomous mode in action, here it is, minus the scores from the New Jersey regional and the Championship event, those will be included later on.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?p=621018 Thanks for watching, /dan |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 game poll #10 (team prediction before kickoff) | dhitchco | Rumor Mill | 0 | 18-11-2005 12:17 |
| Forethought: A Must-Read Before Posting | Rich Kressly | General Forum | 11 | 06-01-2005 09:10 |
| vB3 is here. READ THIS BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS! | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 3 | 01-12-2003 21:27 |
| PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE NATIONALS | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 24-06-2002 02:57 |
| more time before forums are marked as read | mike o'leary | CD Forum Support | 3 | 29-07-2001 05:34 |