|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Read the 1st post. | |||
| 39 |
|
6 | 3.55% |
| 67 |
|
9 | 5.33% |
| 79 |
|
7 | 4.14% |
| 233 |
|
23 | 13.61% |
| 340 |
|
13 | 7.69% |
| 375 |
|
13 | 7.69% |
| 386 |
|
5 | 2.96% |
| 910 |
|
5 | 2.96% |
| 1114 |
|
25 | 14.79% |
| 1902 |
|
57 | 33.73% |
| 1730 |
|
6 | 3.55% |
| Voters: 169. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
Why isn't 1126 on this list? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
We really didn't want to change much since we were doing so well in all other respects. In hind sight, the reward may have outweighed the risk. Our system consisted of 4 ultra-sonic sensors. One low on the robot, aimed to detect the base of the rack. 3 right below our gripper to detect the foot. The basic program for auto mode went like this: deploy the gripper/tube start to move the tube to scoring height start moving forward - timed - this lets us ignore our lower sensor while it calibrated and prevented false readings in case it saw the gripper deploy. using the lower sensor - drive to within scoring distance of the rack using the upper sensor pod, center the robot on the nearest spider foot robot turns right/left to seek the foot If foot found, lower gripper - release tube - wait for auto to end else release tube regardless at 14.5 seconds The upper sensors were read by a custom curcuit which fed back 2 bits of target data to the RC. The data that came back represented the possible foot locations from the sensor pod's point of view: Center Right Left Unknown The original plan was to have more info go back to the RC but our first cut at the communications did not work and we ran out of time. Last edited by ericand : 23-04-2007 at 12:15. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
i vote 1126
as well, why are they not on the list they were consistentLast edited by Sislith : 22-06-2007 at 13:35. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
is it just me but is the web site down
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
Quote:
i think that we hit on like 85% to 90% throughout the whole year(maybe a little high but im just guessing) but ne who ![]() |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Poll: Best Autonomous(read the 1st post before voting)
I put my voice in for 1902, the accuracy on that hog was outstanding. I would also like to give my honorable mention to 386 with the "cool" factor. Many teams have Easy Buttons in their driver station, but not many teams have a functional Easy Button on their robot that they use as a sensor for autonomous mode.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2006 game poll #10 (team prediction before kickoff) | dhitchco | Rumor Mill | 0 | 18-11-2005 12:17 |
| Forethought: A Must-Read Before Posting | Rich Kressly | General Forum | 11 | 06-01-2005 09:10 |
| vB3 is here. READ THIS BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS! | Brandon Martus | Announcements | 3 | 01-12-2003 21:27 |
| PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE NATIONALS | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 24-06-2002 02:57 |
| more time before forums are marked as read | mike o'leary | CD Forum Support | 3 | 29-07-2001 05:34 |