|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: A little more standard
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
I like your design.
However, a few questions; How much does the entire robot base as pictured weigh? How much does each wheel module with motor weigh? keep up the good work |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
thanks, the entire robot weighs 52 pounds with arm and modules, however, this does not include elctronics and chains which I bet adds to at least 20 pounds and could be more, so i think it would weigh between 70-90 pounds.
Each module with motor is 5.05 lbs. thanks |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
I'm having a hard time seeing what the benefits are with this design, all I can tell and assume is your going to have an issue with keeping those gearboxes safe. I also can tell that if you are rotating your wheels those gearboxes are going to rotate outside of the robot too, and thats just asking for trouble.
If I was designing this, I would mount 2 andymark or a custom shifter (or not) gearbox vertically inside the robot, and then run chains to each corner. Each module would have a shaft that ran down the tube, and mated bevel gears to the wheel shaft, then have just the wheels exposed Other than that, the chassis and arm design looks good! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
looks great,
the gearboxes look a little wobbly to me. maybe they need better support? and better protection too? but on the whole, very nice. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
I love the design, but I still don't know if the floor to robot strength is going to be enough..... You have to think about the possibilities of.... Is that going to be strong enough to have something that weighs around 130 hitting you consecutive times, and is anything going to break. I do like the swivel steer ideas, but I am more of a person who builds my robots like a tank. That way, it is durable, easy to fix, and I don’t have to worry about it after every round. Other then that great design.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: A little more standard
Quote:
I don't want to turn this into a "tanks vs miracle machine" debate. I just want to point out that you have to understand the strengths and weaknesses (yes they all have weaknesses) of your robot, and prepare to deal with those. //back on topic I'd love to see that drivetrain in action. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: A more standard aproach | Alex.Norton | Extra Discussion | 12 | 01-05-2007 21:44 |
| An apology from someone a little foolish, a little selfish, and a little inconsiderat | Ken Leung | General Forum | 16 | 01-11-2006 10:07 |
| A Little Help... A Little Code? | xxmaddjxx | Programming | 4 | 18-08-2004 19:58 |
| pic: little holguin | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 23-04-2004 01:46 |
| A little more complicated, but I'll figure it out... | Erin | General Forum | 12 | 01-06-2001 14:35 |