|
|
|
 We are customers to FIRST. In that comes expectations. I don't want to hear another, "You should be grateful for everything FIRST does" nonsense when FIRST royally screws up. - MikeDubreuil [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
19-08-2007, 00:37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 114 New Gearbox Design
Can you show me the numbers that prove that statement? All of the numbers I've seen (the ones FIRST gives us for the small CIM are at 100amps of draw) point to the Large CIM being more powerful. Plus, with only one motor, there's no torque fighting or loss form having two motors.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 114 2 speed Gearbox | CraigHickman | Technical Discussion | 13 | 25-02-2007 19:41 |
| pic: 114 Gearbox CAD | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 7 | 26-01-2007 23:37 |
| pic: 1881 new gearbox design | GMAdan | Extra Discussion | 7 | 21-12-2006 01:59 |
| pic: 114 drive module design | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 3 | 06-12-2006 21:59 |
| pic: 114 gearbox design | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 4 | 05-12-2006 19:53 |
Threaded Mode