|
|
|
 Removing too much of the challenge removes too much of the accomplishment when you solve the problem. Removing too much of the challenge removes too much of the innovation in the solutions... removing too much of the challenge removes too much of the fun.
- dlavery [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Championship Winners trend
67; 2004 division champ, 2005 champ
217; 2005 division champ, 2006 champ 177; 2006 division champ, 2007 champ I'm not sure how far this goes back, but I'm pretty sure it didn't happen in '04 (none of 71,435,494 were division winners in '03 right?). Why is this? Coincidence? My theory is that these are strong teams anyway, capable of being a contendor any year. Also, they probably had an especially good group of students/mentors those years. What's interesting is that none of them were finalists in their previous year, just semifinalists/division winners. My prediction, one of these 6(9 including finalists) teams will win it all next year; 173 330 910 1270 1319 1902 (71) (179) (233) what do you think? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trend? | Kel D | General Forum | 2 | 22-03-2006 00:27 |
| FantasyFIRST Championship Winners! | Jessica Boucher | Fantasy FIRST | 8 | 10-05-2005 20:52 |
| Championship Winners! | tkwetzel | Thanks and/or Congrats | 25 | 04-05-2005 23:12 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Championship Registration for Qualifying Regional Event Winners | Rich Wong | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 0 | 07-03-2005 22:51 |
| Championship winners | blindguyinanorg | Championship Event | 2 | 27-04-2004 22:50 |
Threaded Mode