|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seems like a very old topic, but very interesting
You can use both the Bernoulli and equation of continuity in this case too. However, you cannot dictate both the pressure and the area of cross-section of the flow. Given one, the other chooses its own value. Here, as height changes (and atm pressure remains const) the velocity of the fluid increases. To account for this, c/s area of the flow decreases according to the continuity equation. The fluid does not use the whole of the tube cross-sectional area for its flow, which is the mistake you seem to have made. __________________________________________________ _________________ Ganesh Mani Mechanical Engineering IIT Bombay |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bernoullis versus Continuity
Waiting for replies
__________________________________________________ _________________ Ganesh Mani Mechanical Engineering IIT Bombay |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: RAGE 173 versus ... Vex ?!? | artdutra04 | Extra Discussion | 7 | 24-10-2005 17:04 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 42 | 26-04-2005 19:19 |
| One-Regional versus Multi-Regional teams | Natchez | Regional Competitions | 25 | 20-04-2004 20:40 |
| Reigonals versus startegies | MisterX | Rules/Strategy | 11 | 29-03-2004 00:04 |
| 2-wheel versus 4-wheel drive | Ben Mitchell | Technical Discussion | 23 | 07-11-2003 00:50 |