|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not perfect ;-) There is no PERFECT design in my view
Posted by David, Student on team #269, BruQuest, from Oconomowoc High School and Quest .
Posted on 3/3/99 5:51 PM MST In Reply to: The Perfect Design posted by Dan on 3/2/99 8:59 PM MST: OK, here is what I have to say: Our robot used a system to climb the puck that would allow it to climb the puck even with your robot on it. It's not easy to explain. Basically we climb the puck and then not completely on it just raise our backwheels to be off the ground. (We don't use the poles though... it worked really good. We had only one match at the Midwest Open, not ending up on the puck) Our design also lets us move the puck while being on it, we just have to raise the backwheels to again be off the ground. So your robot would allow us to get the 2-multiplier and the 3-multiplier for being on the puck. but your idea is not bad though ;-) CYA David |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How do you design your robot? | Gui Cavalcanti | General Forum | 23 | 16-11-2003 18:33 |
| a web design trivia question | robot180 | Website Design/Showcase | 5 | 17-10-2003 19:46 |
| gearing design calculation question | caffel | Motors | 4 | 24-03-2003 17:34 |
| Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... | dlavery | General Forum | 157 | 07-01-2003 23:55 |
| Team 401's design | jonnywalk | Technical Discussion | 2 | 30-01-2002 23:02 |