|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
New Jersey Regional
Posted by Johnny Bledsoe, Engineer on team #116, Robo-Hoboes, from Herndon High School and NASA Headquarters.
Posted on 3/20/99 6:53 PM MST 36 teams played 10 qualifying matches apiece. The Elite Eight 1. Team #153 Somerset and Rutgers 2. Team #37 Cordis and Mast Academy 3. Team #75 Johnson & Johnson Hillsboro 4. Team #102 Ortho & Somerville 5. Team #88 Johnson & Johnson Bridgewater Raynham 6. Team #133 Bonny Eagle High School 7. Team #56 Ethicon & Bound Brook 8. Team #273 Johnson & Johnson & Miller The Alliances 1. Team #153 picked Team 84 (11th seed) 2. Team #37 picked Team 266 (9th seed) 3. Team #75 picked Team 89 (12th seed) 4. Team #102 picked Team 97 (13th seed) 5. Team #88 picked Team 211 (18th seed) 6. Team #133 picked Team 103 (15th seed) 7. Team #56 picked Team 11 (21st seed) 8. Team #273 picked 303 (10th seed) Quarter's 102/97 beat 88/211 56/11 beat 37/266 75/89 beat 133/103 153/84 beat 273/303 Semi's 102/97 beat 56/11 75/89 beat 153/84 Final 75/89 beat 102/97 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Johnson & Johnson & Johnson & Johnson
Posted by Joe Johnson, Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.
Posted on 3/20/99 7:22 PM MST In Reply to: New Jersey Regional posted by Johnny Bledsoe on 3/20/99 6:53 PM MST: Am I to understand that the Johnson & Johnson Regional was won by an alliance of Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson? J. Johnson P.S. I guess that MIT must have had a pretty respectable team (team 97, seeded #13 and was picked by seed #4, they were on the second place alliance). MIT should have a robot worthy of the institution. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Johnson & Johnson & Johnson & Johnson
Posted by Frank of team #97, Psychedelics, from CRLS sponsored by MIT.
Posted on 3/21/99 4:46 AM MST In Reply to: Johnson & Johnson & Johnson & Johnson posted by Joe Johnson on 3/20/99 7:22 PM MST: Thanks Joe... We've got a pretty defensive bot. Good for controlling the puck. I'm really proud of the kids and what they've done. Our driver is great this year! Good luck to everyone in Detroit this week! Frank Team 97 MIT/CRLS 1999 WildStang 1996-98 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank goes to MIT, MIT gets to Finals, coincidence? I think not.
Posted by Joe Johnson, Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.
Posted on 3/21/99 8:45 AM MST In Reply to: Re: Johnson & Johnson & Johnson & Johnson posted by Frank on 3/21/99 4:46 AM MST: Hey Frank, It had escaped my mind that you had joined the MIT team. I like what you've done out there, keep it up ;-) Well done (to Frank and to all on the MIT team). Joe J. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's a team effort
Posted by Frank of team #97, Psychedelics, from CRLS sponsored by MIT.
Posted on 3/22/99 10:09 AM MST In Reply to: Frank goes to MIT, MIT gets to Finals, coincidence? I think not. posted by Joe Johnson on 3/21/99 8:45 AM MST: We all have to remember that this competition is a team effort. No one person can ever take credit for what an entire team has accomplished. Our team has almost 100% turnover every year in both MIT students and in students from the high school. It was a whole new team and everyone did their best to make our robot the best one out there. I brought some insight from what WildStang has done and trends in FIRST. Others brought expert machining and organization. We would never have made it into the finals if we were lacking one single person on our team. I'd like to thank everyone on the team for a job well done and to wish all the teams good luck in Detroit this week and in FL next month. Frank |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
And yet, there is always a heart and sole
Posted by Joe Johnson, Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.
Posted on 3/22/99 6:58 PM MST In Reply to: It's a team effort posted by Frank on 3/22/99 10:09 AM MST: Well said, Frank. I admire you all the more. My only comment is that while every successful FIRST team requires a team effort, it is also important that every team has a heart and sole. From my observation, Raul and Dan personify that heart and sole on the Wildstang team. Bill and Brian Beatty ("Beatty, the older" and "Beatty, the younger" when they are not within earshot ;-) are that heart and sole for Team Hammond. I have not observed the MIT team in action, but I would not be surprised to discover that Frank is a key contributor to the MIT heart and sole department. Again, hats off to MIT and their great finish last weekend. Joe J. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: And yet, there is always a heart and sole
Posted by Raul, Engineer on team #111, Wildstang, from Rolling Meadows & Wheeling HS and Motorola.
Posted on 3/23/99 7:23 PM MST In Reply to: And yet, there is always a heart and sole posted by Joe Johnson on 3/22/99 6:58 PM MST: Joe, Thanks for the kind comments. I think you and the Mike's are the H & S of the Chief. FYI - Frank is home on spring break and we are bringing him with us to Great Lakes. See you in a couple of days. Raul |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting patterns
Posted by Joe Johnson, Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.
Posted on 3/20/99 8:09 PM MST In Reply to: New Jersey Regional posted by Johnny Bledsoe on 3/20/99 6:53 PM MST: Some interesting things from the results of the NJ: Assuming the results posted are correct (as well as the top 10 at the end of Friday), then: 1) all the top 8 teams came from the top 10 at the end of Friday (but there was significant trading of positions) 2) the teams that made it to the elimination tourney were ranked 1-13, 15, 18, & 21. In other words unlike in Chicago at least, there was not significant picking out of order. Only teams 18 and 21 don't belong in the gang of 16 according to the ranking. 3) the #1 seed did not win it again. The number one seed has finished #1 Chicago, #3 California, #2 Florida, #8 Philly, and #3 or #4 New Jersey. Not a great predictor of success. 4) rookies are doing okay based on their represention in the group of 8 and the gang of 16. (they are ~ 1/3 of all teams so we would expect 2.7/8 and 5.3/16 if the competition was a random picking of teams, to the extent that having experience is an advantage, we would expect that they would not meet this number) Chicago: 2/8 and 2/16 (no rookie picked teams, ouch!) California: 5/8 and 10/16 (very high percentage of rookies at this regional) Florida: 2/8 and 6/16 Philly: 2/8 and 3/16 New Jersey: 1/8 and 3/16 Average: 2.4/8 and 4.8/16 Average w/o CA: 1.75/8 and 3.5/16 I will be honest, I expected much worse numbers than that. In fact, I had originally type "rookies are under represented... " It is a classic case of reading my own biases into the data. I was sure that the rookies were getting a raw deal this year, until I actually studied the numbers. Hats off to all the rookie teams out there running with the big dogs. Keep up the pressure. Joe J. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Break Down of Awards By Fields. | Josh Hambright | Championship Event | 13 | 09-04-2003 10:22 |
| Canadian Regional | geo | Regional Competitions | 9 | 03-04-2003 22:58 |
| Regional Team List | Jack | General Forum | 5 | 03-01-2003 12:05 |
| The 'Big Picture' regarding regional space.. | archiver | 2000 | 1 | 23-06-2002 23:58 |
| New Jersey Regional | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:08 |