|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tri-Alliances?
Posted by Mike King, Other on team #88, TJē, from Bridgewater Raynham and Johnson & Johnson Professional.
Posted on 3/29/99 9:42 PM MST In Reply to: Re: Tri-Alliances? posted by Jerry Eckert on 3/29/99 3:27 PM MST: : I personally don't see how this affects teams who participated in the : other reginals in any way. I've seen a number of people claim that : changing the format is unfair to those who competed in other regionals. : Perhaps someone could elaborate on why this is so? : I don't see the change as a 'consistency problem', but rather a reaction : to problems which were noted in some of the other regional contests. : I applaud FIRST for being willing to change the contest in order to : fix (or attempt to fix, depending on your point of view) the problems. : - Jerry I agree with you Jerry, It doesn't affect the results of the other regionals, because the regionals don't have binding power upon anything except for themselves. I won't start crying foul until the results of the regionals decide who goto the nationals. Mike King |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Qualification results from KSC & alliances (WASH w/ SOAP) | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 01:38 |
| Powerhouse teams vs. Powerhouse Alliances... | archiver | 2001 | 5 | 24-06-2002 00:40 |
| Prebuilt alliances? | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 23-06-2002 23:56 |
| Thank You! to our alliances from 'Aces High' Team 176 | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:49 |
| Both alliances sitting in endzone with 10 seconds left? | Mike Soukup | General Forum | 7 | 24-03-2002 18:55 |