Go to Post I quickly realized that, "hey, I'm looking at a wonderful piece of technology that defies gravity" and I calmed down quite a bit. - Elgin Clock [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 1999
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:16
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Warning: Don't Touch Your Robot

Posted by Jeff Burch, Engineer on team #45, TechnoKats, from Kokomo High School and Delphi Delco Electronics Systems.

Posted on 3/29/99 11:06 AM MST


In Reply to: Re: Warning: Don't Touch Your Robot posted by Chris on 3/29/99 10:26 AM MST:



: Chris Wrote ...
:...
: BUT (there's always a but), if the situation occurred as you described,
: I don't know if I completely agree with the DQ call. In the rule book,
: it states that a human player is allowed to touch a robot for reasons of
: personal protection. If the human player was losing his/her balance and
: was about to fall on the robot, it would be foolish not to grab the robot
: as the human player would surely be more likely to get hurt falling on
: the robot than touching it. However, if the human player was doing
: something questionable that caused him/her to lose balance, then perhaps
: it was the human player's fault and the DQ was warranted. This is a
: tricky issue. I wish I would have seen the infraction.

The question of personal safety was discussed. The referees decided that
by leaning into the interaction zone the student was putting himself at risk
as opposed to the robot doing something that put the human player at risk.
Andy and I are teammates and I agree that the referees made the correct call.
The fact that this rule was not strictly enforced doesn't mean it should not
have been enforced here, but it did make it more dificult for the students
to deal with.

I don't agree that the match should be ended in the eliminations when a
team is disqualified. Although it's not very likely, there is a chance
the other alliance may also do something that disquilifies them before
the match is over.

Jeff Burch


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much planning goes into your robot? Jnadke General Forum 41 29-01-2006 21:29
serious problem found - robot controller resets when jarred! KenWittlief Electrical 23 19-03-2003 13:30
WASH Palm scouting at the Championship Mike Soukup Scouting 2 19-04-2002 15:14
Index of team's post about their robot... Ken Leung Robot Showcase 1 20-03-2002 17:10
about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? Ken Leung Technical Discussion 12 26-11-2001 09:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:16.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi