|
|
|
 With three robots, I was expecting better scores but I guess more robots means more penalties, not more points. - sanddrag [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| With three robots, I was expecting better scores but I guess more robots means more penalties, not more points. - sanddrag [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#12
13-11-2007, 23:43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Visual Basic
I really meant my fall through explanation to be focused on C/C++. Frankly, I have never used it in a C# application, but I assumed the C-style syntax would support it...I was apparently wrong.
So, let's apply my previous post to C/C++ only. Also, the link you posted is a good work around for a fall through. However, as a practice, GOTO statements violate OOP principals, and I try to avoid them at all costs. P.S....I've been itching for a correlary to __asm (from C++) in C#. Perrhaps __cpp, or __C++, or __cplusplus to allow for inline C++ code in C#. I suppose I'll never see it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Visual Basic help needed. | Cody Carey | Programming | 1 | 25-02-2007 15:06 |
| Visual Basic Scouting Problem | Jeffel | Programming | 7 | 11-02-2005 19:30 |
| Visual Basic | dddriveman | Programming | 12 | 20-03-2004 13:03 |
| Visual Basic 6 Dashboard | LBK Rules | Programming | 1 | 22-01-2003 13:06 |
Threaded Mode