Go to Post You might even learn something! - Tom Bottiglieri [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-12-2007, 22:06
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,658
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Torque

Quote:
Originally Posted by neoshaakti View Post
kinda, but how exactly does torque factor in to making your robot?
how would I know my robot was "at 343.4oz-in" and therefore causing a stall?
To answer this it might help if we use an example. I'll choose an example that is relatively easy to implement, and might be used in a FIRST robotics competition robot if it matched the needs of a team's game strategy.

Suppose your robot weighs 135 lb (with a battery in it) and has four wheels that share its weight equally. So each wheel supports 135/4 = 33.75 lb.

Now let's assume your wheels have a friction coefficient (on standard FRC carpet) of 1.0, which is typical of the 6 inch diameter AndyMark FIRST kit wheel. So each wheel can develop a traction (pushing) force of up to 33.75 lb; any more force would cause it to slip on the carpet. The maximum useful wheel torque is therefore the product of the wheel radius and the slip force, 3 in x 33.75 lb = 101.25 lb-in. As sumadin and fimmel pointed out earlier, this torque could also be expressed in ounce-inches (oz-in): 101.25 lb-in x 16 oz/lb = 1620 oz-in.

Now let's make one more assumption: we select a speed reduction ratio from the CIM motor to the wheel of 12 to 1. This ratio is typical of gearboxes that have been included in past FRC kits of parts. Using this ratio, we can calculate that the CIM motor torque required to make your wheels slip is 1620/12 = 135 oz-in. [Notice I have assumed that each wheel is driven by its own CIM motor, and I have ignored frictional losses in the gearing.]

We know that the CIM motor can develop that torque because it is less than the rated stall torque. The CIM motor can develop that torque while drawing 135/343.4 = 0.393 or 39.3% of its rated stall current. The rated stall current is found on the CIM motor data sheet and its value is 133 Ampere. So the current required to spin this robots wheels would be 39.3% x 133 Ampere = 52.3 Ampere. [This current would be drawn by each of four CIM motors, just before they began to spin freely.]

The robot's top speed would be given by the CIM motor's free speed x the wheel's circumference, divided by the gear ratio: 5310 rev/minute x (1 minute/ 60 seconds) x (6 inches * PI) / 12 = 139 inches per second, or 11.6 feet per second. The robot will not actually reach this speed, because friction and other power losses will limit top motor speed to something less than the free speed. Factors that influence the choice of robot speed have been discussed in another thread recently.

Of course a practical drivetrain design needs to consider many other factors that I neglected in the simple example above. You might want to use wheels with a different friction coefficient, or use a different gear ratio. You might want to use a different number of driven wheels. You might not have equal sharing of the robot's weight among the wheels. Any of these would complicate the analysis above, but the principles remain the same.

Chief Delphi has a very good White Papers collection. Many good references on drive train design can be found there.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)

Last edited by Richard Wallace : 01-12-2007 at 22:27.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-12-2007, 00:23
Qbranch Qbranch is offline
wow college goes fast.
AKA: Alex
FRC #1024 (Kil-A-Bytes)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,174
Qbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond reputeQbranch has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Torque

Also keep in mind you don't want to design for stall torque. Most things don't like to operate at their limits, case in point the CIM motor... it becomes more a electro->thermal energy conversion device as opposed to an electro->mechanical energy conversion device as its torque output approaches stall.

Remember, this heating is nothing to fool around with: A CIM motor at stall eats approximately 133A... since we run CIMs at 12VDC that would make the motor a 1,596watt space heater... thats a more heat than even your biggest plug-in portable space heaters.

I posted the CIM pdf a little while ago, i'm sure you'll find the torque curves and points of interest charts useful: http://rapidshare.com/files/51500157/CIM.pdf

I also have the big (3") CIM empirical data graphs and tables somewhere....... just have to figure out where I left them

Also, if you are still having trouble understanding torques, I have a physics refrence (ebook) i can direct you to.

Have fun...

-q
__________________
Electrical Engineer Illini
1024 | Programmer '06, '07, '08 | Driver '08
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Torque on motors Torboticsmember Motors 4 07-09-2007 13:46
Torque curves BionicAlumni Motors 4 29-04-2004 20:07
torque motor archiver 2001 3 24-06-2002 00:06
How fast could a torque motor turn if a torque motor could.. archiver 2001 0 23-06-2002 22:54
Speed vs. Torque? archiver 2001 12 23-06-2002 22:11


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi