|
|
|
 A good way to minimize the possibility of breaking things is to minimize the number of things that can break. - s_forbes [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| A good way to minimize the possibility of breaking things is to minimize the number of things that can break. - s_forbes [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interrupts per second
Hello everyone,
I've been looking around the forums and have seen several posts but I haven't seen a definite answer. My team is designing a robot and we want to put encoders on it. Questions arose concerning the fact that encoders we have are 100 clicks/revolution, and we are planning on having the wheels turning at .7 - 1 rev/second, meaning 700 to 1000 clicks per second of the encoders * 2 sides. We were wondering, can the RC handle 2000 interrupts a second, in addition to whatever it takes to run the camera and essentially the default code? Thanks, --Ryan |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 10 Balls per second? | Travis Covington | Rumor Mill | 103 | 26-07-2006 00:06 |
| 17 matches per team @ AZ? | jpsaul7usa | Regional Competitions | 12 | 05-03-2005 22:12 |
| Interrupts per second | steven114 | Programming | 10 | 17-02-2004 13:59 |
| Average Feet per Second | MisterX | General Forum | 25 | 26-01-2004 21:03 |
| Code cycles per second | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 02:43 |
Threaded Mode