|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Quote:
This is another good idea. I will look into it. AB |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Don't encourage him, he's supposed to be studying for finals!
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
I'm stunned. What a brilliant idea. No to tell you the truth, I was just looking for models for the AM Single Speed and ran across it. Screw getting my new year's kiss, I'm gonna wait on AndyMark.
I like the idea of the stacking planetaries though as well... maybe Andy has plans for that down the road as well. ![]() |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
how many of them can you stack up and not break stuff? 3.57 to the 5th power is a big number....multiply that by the torque you can get out of a typical motor .....think final stage BB failure....
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Dude. This is awesome! I have a feeling you'll start seeing AM parts on 114 sometime soon... The quality has been going up and up, and I'm really quite impressed with the stuff you guys are rolling out.
A gearbox that is stackable makes a great arm setup. Sweet! |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Ooh....yeah, that's definitely something to thing about....hopefully there will be some posted "recommended" limitations depending on the torque of your motor. Since they are supposedly infinitely stackable, no matter how hard those gears are hardened, there will always be a breaking point.
|
|
#22
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Quote:
Andy B. |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
The only reason I brought it up is that I have seen some "interesting" use of compound gear reduction by a team that didn't seem to understand the problem of too much torque on too small of a shaft. As richardmcc2 noted, publishing a maximum torque spec would be helpful, because the ability to make a 530:1 transmission is really tempting for driving a heavy arm.
|
|
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Stackerbox is now up on the AndyMark site.
An assembly print will be uploaded fairly soon. CAD is already available to download (.stp file). Thanks for all of the comments. Enjoy! Andy B. |
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
That's neat! and I see you implemented Steve's CIM idea....
|
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
I love AM, they seem to always put a smile on my face. I was just thinking about gearboxes the other day in school. My team always likes to use chains for our mechanisms but they always seem to fail (usually because if missing pins lol) and this looks like a great alternative. I'm assuming that these will go through some preliminary testing when the first batch is shipped so there's not another BB like issue. Also when their stacked does one bolt right into the other flush or is there a little space and also is there a need to regrease the gears after they have been grease the first time?
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Do you know the weight of one of these?
|
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Andy said around 1.5 lbs, on the first page of the thread
|
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: AndyMark Stackerbox
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AndyMark Wheels | Andy Grady | Inventor | 2 | 05-02-2007 16:49 |
| AndyMark Mecanum | whytheheckme | Technical Discussion | 5 | 27-01-2007 23:57 |
| andymark? | Ian_Xodus | General Forum | 9 | 18-01-2007 22:08 |
| AndyMark Mecanums | Joe_Widen | Technical Discussion | 10 | 05-09-2006 22:12 |
| Andymark.biz | Andy Baker | Technical Discussion | 119 | 01-05-2006 23:30 |