|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you support a longer autonomous period? | |||
| Yes |
|
93 | 46.73% |
| No |
|
76 | 38.19% |
| Maybe...I'll have to think on that one. |
|
30 | 15.08% |
| Voters: 199. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Autonomous Longer????
More time... I'd love it!
But I think it would add a few more requirements for the hardware on the FIRST robots. More time means more time to gather more data from sensors... more data volume from sensors usually means more processing and more processing complication to corellate multi-sensor input and make an intelligent response to that data. Maybe one of the new Microchip PIC 32-bit processors? I know that we had a fantastic autonomous mode that used scanning ultrasonics, but it took 0~2 seconds too long to complete... partly because we had 2 seconds worth of scan+process time to solve out a (horrendously complicated) trigonometric solution, and noise filter/bandpass all the data. Along with more autonomous time... and I know I'm just dreaming here... it would be awesome if NI could offer one of its field point vision boxes at a discount to FIRST teams. I might point out that NI vision in various forms is used extensively in the fully autonomous, bipedal RoboCup competition. -q |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Banebot transmission no longer COTS? | flightofone | Motors | 24 | 02-02-2007 16:41 |
| Joystick Triggers No Longer Work | amateurrobotguy | Technical Discussion | 7 | 04-04-2006 13:58 |
| IE No Longer Getting Updated | HFWang | Website Design/Showcase | 62 | 01-11-2003 03:25 |
| I will no longer be doing FIRST¡K | archiver | 2001 | 12 | 24-06-2002 04:20 |
| longer PMs? | Joe Ross | CD Forum Support | 1 | 10-08-2001 18:06 |