|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Mounting of drive system
Not only that, it was a good technical question that prompted further discussion. It has been a while since we've had a good live vs dead axel discussion.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mounting of drive system
Last year we used shoulder bolts as axels through the frame, which worked well.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Live and dead axle drivetrain
For the two years we've done 6 wheel (06, 07), Team 190 used both live and dead axles. The center wheels were driven using live axles with a keyed shaft and the end wheels were sprocket and chain driven from the center on dead axles.
Besides the gearing change between the years, the only major difference between the two drivelines was the chain path. In 06, we had a convoluted one to incorporate a system that got taken off the robot before ship, and after almost every match we were retracking a chain. In 07, we had straight chains with simple tensioners and never had any drivetrain problems (until we got to offseason demos and the bearing blocks had worked themselves loose). The advantage to this system was that it was compact, as the center axle was just the output shaft after a gear reduction, and the outer wheels were just shafts bolted to the frame with wheels on them. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Drive Mobility System | Kam-AL | Motors | 7 | 11-01-2006 19:17 |
| Best Drive system | rcubes85 | Control System | 8 | 12-01-2005 22:32 |
| pic: Drive System | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 3 | 27-02-2003 14:11 |
| DRIVE SYSTEM | archiver | 2001 | 6 | 24-06-2002 02:30 |
| Drive System | archiver | 2000 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:57 |