|
I like it!
Posted by Daniel, Student on team #192, Gunn Robotics Team, from Henry M Gunn Senior High School and NASA Ames.
Posted on 4/26/99 11:58 PM MST
In Reply to: Scoring and Defense. posted by Sean Kim on 4/26/99 11:00 PM MST:
Not a bad suggestion.
In fact, this would reduce the effect of a high scoring round on teams that simply got lucky. However, it also would bring a team that got unlucky for one round WAY down in the standings. Maybe. It's hard to say. Perhaps we're on to something here, maybe it should be more like seeding was last year.
First tried to give a heavy multiplier for winning a match, but that only magnified the effect of a high scoring round. 1620 QPs for one round? Easy top 16.
One last comment. In the finals, teams are ranked solely on wins and losses. Why should the goal of the QMs be different than that of the finals?
What do all of you other highly opinionated people think? (it's scary how well that describes me)
-Daniel
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
|
I walked out to the area where the robot was getting ready to move, and there's no room near the robot. I look again, and realize it's all students. - rachakate [more] 
Similar Threads
Hybrid Mode
