|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
RPM's
How many rpm's is manageable for an FRC robot? And also, does anyone know the speed reduction in a 2007 KOP transmission box.
Basically I'm trying to figure out whether a KOP transmission box is provides sufficient speed reduction... And sorry for the multiple questions, but is it possible to mount a wheel directly to a globe motor? (specs) or are globe motors more for arms and lifters? thank you! ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
Math error: see post below.
Last edited by AndyB : 15-12-2007 at 17:28. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
Quote:
However, there are sprockets provided in the kit (2007) for this purpose, which will give you enough of a reduction to drive at a reasonable speed. You could mount a wheel directly to the globe motor, but it is not a good idea for two reasons. Reason one: Globe motors are more for arms and mechanisms like you said, rather than drive motors. They rotate at about 90 rpm, iirc, which is very very slow for a drive system. In addition, they need to be geared down further to provide any sort of torque. Reason two: Globe motors are notoriously bad at handling side loads. Mounting a wheel directly to the output shaft is asking for trouble, as eventually the motor will go bad. In general, the drive motors in the KOP consist of the 2 small CIM's, the 2 large CIM's, and the 2 Fisher Price motors. You'd have much better luck using any of these. Quote:
Last edited by Cory : 15-12-2007 at 17:16. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
It has been done. 330's 2002 robot used them to drive a mini-robot for extra points. However, that was maybe 4lbs of metal and wheels. More than that I wouldn't do. (We also used them on an arm in 2004--we used two of them for that particular arm.)
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
CIM Motor RPM = 5310
Reduction = 12:1 Reduced RPM = 442 How'd i mess that one up... 6 * 3.1415 = 18.849" circumfrence 18.849 * 442 / 60/ 12 = 11.5 Feet Per Second Wow, must have hit the wrong button somewhere. Thanks Cory. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
Remember that this calculation is for the CIM's free speed. The motor will never achieve that speed on a robot because of load, so the actual output speed is probably something closer to 45/50% of this.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RPM's
hmmm so according to AndyB, the reduced free RPM's or a 2.5'' CIM motor would be 442 rpm...so how much more reduction would a sprocket provide?
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
That depends on which sprockets you use, but 2:1 reduction is typical.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
actually lots of RPMs do the work for our team- our Raider Parent Mentor organization....
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RPM's
Quote:
![]() just wanted to let you know that this question is a result of the KOP gear box you lent us...thanks a bunch ![]() Last edited by neoshaakti : 15-12-2007 at 19:55. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RPM's
Something like this inexpensive digital tach might be useful for measuring and calculating a robot's actual top speed:
http://www.meter-depot.com/tacho.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RPM's | Mike o. | Technical Discussion | 1 | 30-01-2002 18:48 |