|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RPM's
hmmm so according to AndyB, the reduced free RPM's or a 2.5'' CIM motor would be 442 rpm...so how much more reduction would a sprocket provide?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
That depends on which sprockets you use, but 2:1 reduction is typical.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RPM's
actually lots of RPMs do the work for our team- our Raider Parent Mentor organization....
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RPM's
Quote:
![]() just wanted to let you know that this question is a result of the KOP gear box you lent us...thanks a bunch ![]() Last edited by neoshaakti : 15-12-2007 at 19:55. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RPM's
Something like this inexpensive digital tach might be useful for measuring and calculating a robot's actual top speed:
http://www.meter-depot.com/tacho.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RPM's | Mike o. | Technical Discussion | 1 | 30-01-2002 18:48 |