|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players
Posted by michael bastoni, Coach on team #23, PNTA, from Plymouth North High School and Boston Edison Co.
Posted on 5/7/99 7:12 PM MST Guys (Women included), Isn't the solution to your frustration obvious? The kids, the engineers, the teachers and the marvelous parents that help....they all need the same remedy for the same frustration....they all need to PLAY WITH THEIR ROBOT MORE... Not wait till next year to work so very hard to play so very little.....but to work very hard to play ALOT... To play enough to make the effort worthwhile...and I can think of only one way to accomplish this without all of us giving up our day job.....extend the FIRST cycle time to 36-48 months... It is PLAYING WITH THE ROBOT that is just as inspirational as building it.... FYI I just returned from 2 days at the MIT 2007 Design Competition. Wow...very cool...and looking more and more like FIRST. The 2007 design competition is the genesis of FIRST...it is the competition orginated by the good doctor his own self. DEKA hung a banner and the MIT FIRST team offered a show and tell.... I went because I wanted to 'sense' the roots of FIRST.. I went because I am listening to Dodd Stacy and JJ and Tom Wibble and so many more of you who do not frequent these pages... and I am trying desperately to formulate a consensus.. I believe we are all searching for a way through the FIRST woods.....and we are coming close.... But I noticed one thing at 2007...the students are doing the design process FOR COURSE CREDIT....the students are BUILDING THE MACHINES....and every student who completes a machine gets an A for the course...Participation in 2007 is FREE (There have been kit costs in the past but GM made them free this year)and get this....of the original contestants....about 50% were none or low functional... But please note that those top robots who were functional were very functional... So within the parameters of 2007, a builder can work hard learn by doing and laugh when things go wrong...and walk away with little or no frustration... Because, They have not sold themselves to a sponsor, promised their community that if they send them to Disney World they will do their best (and be their luckiest)....moreover The kind wonderful MIT prof's are not neglecting curriculum development because 2007 IS CURRICULM..and students are not forgoing grades because 2007 IS THEIR GRADE... Putting FIRST in the classroom is one way to make it serve the valuable purpose that 2007 serves..and this is becoming even more more attractive since the state educational frameworks has added Engineering to the Scince and Technology strand ...and making the game more PLAYABLE is a way to get it into the schools. After all,,,no sports teams practice six to eight weeks in order to play only twice....the kids simply would not stand for it. Campaigning a machine that you as a student helped to maintain, in some instances to design and fabricate...is very very inspirational....not to mention empowering... Look, many FIRST teams have been fortunate in placing many of our FIRST students into good competetive colleges and universities, ..because we can write wonderful truthful letters ABOUT WHAT THEY DID TO MAKE A TEAM SUCCESSFUL not about how inspired they are...but WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DID... Quantitative, descriptive assessments...not anecdotal meanderings about how much they like technology. I loved 2007...I loved the scale of it...the robot building and design effort is in proportion to the playing time.Maybe all we have to do is to get our building effort/costs to playing time proportions in line..... and hats off to Alex Slockum the professor who runs it is a worthy antecedent to Woodie hisself... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
School credit for robot building
Posted by Andrew Trax, Coach on team #180, S.P.A.M., from Southfork,Martin Co. High and UTC.
Posted on 5/8/99 4:42 AM MST In Reply to: To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players posted by michael bastoni on 5/7/99 7:12 PM MST: 'But I noticed one thing at 2007...the students are doing the design process FOR COURSE CREDIT....' In Florida, in grades 1-12, most students have to submit an entry for science fair, whether it's an experiment or report. As an option, students at our team's 2 high schools were given the option of doing a project or being on the FIRST team. Some high schools have incorporated FIRST into the curriculum. It isn't just an after school activity. You make an excellent point. The level of time, money and effort is dispropportionate to the school credit some of the students receive. But I really believe that as more high schools get involved, we may see the robotics teams competing weekly against other local high schools just as the sports teams do. What if the kits and rules were available to classrooms in September. Maybe even the previous year's kits. Call them 'non-national team kits' and a reduced price. Spread them throughout a school district and make it intramural. Leave participation in Regionals and the National as an option. But make the game a local sport as well. It would almost be an 'Advanced Lego League'. And isn't that the real goal? To make science and technology as exciting and rewarding as any sport? Mrs. Trax |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: School credit for robot building
Posted by Andy Grady, Coach on team #42, P.A.R.T.S, from Alvirne High School and Daniel Webster College.
Posted on 5/8/99 3:06 PM MST In Reply to: School credit for robot building posted by Andrew Trax on 5/8/99 4:42 AM MST: How about instead of having the advanced lego league, why doesn't FIRST start the Lego League in september, and have current high schools involved with FIRST be the mentors to the younger students in the lego league. This would help get high school students prepared for FIRST, while allowing them to incorperate Lego League into their school's curriculum and incite intrest from the younger middle and elementary school students. Just think, high school students will begin to see what the program is like from an engineers point of view as the mentors while the younger students will gain the experience of FIRST not only through the Lego League, but also through the stories of FIRST that the high school students can pass on to them. You can't miss!!! Think about it. Cya all, Andy Grady, DWC/Alvirne HS |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
lego and high schools
Posted by michael bastoni, Coach on team #23, PNTA, from Plymouth North High School and Boston Edison Co.
Posted on 5/8/99 4:07 PM MST In Reply to: Re: School credit for robot building posted by Andy Grady on 5/8/99 3:06 PM MST: Andy, You are soooo right on...Our high school FIRST students mentored three FLL teams last year...and we learned something wonderful... 6th, 7th and 8th grade kids would much rather work in concert with high school students....than old men like me...or wonderful teachers like Cindy Greenwood and Beverly Quilty-Dunn...the Intermediate school teachers responsible for the programs success.... In fact this year, these hardworking, talented teachers have spawned as many as 10 teams in our school system...our science coordinator Nick Miccozzi is opening up a Lego robot camp this summer... And if you ask ANYONE involved in the Plymouth FLL...they will willingly credit our FIRST high school students, Ken MAgno, Chris Cotti, Branden Gunn, Mellissa Roy and Nick Christophori, the coach of the 'Winning team... So Andy...your right...and to the rest of you FIRST kids go for it...cause you will feel so good about it...and yes..you can include it as community service on your college apps..... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: School credit for robot building - It's happening here
Posted by Dan, Student on team #10, BSM, from Benilde-St. Margaret's and Banner Engineering.
Posted on 5/8/99 5:39 PM MST In Reply to: Re: School credit for robot building posted by Andy Grady on 5/8/99 3:06 PM MST: I know you're right because I'm doing just that now. I'm in the Advanced Competitive Science class (aka ACS) at my school where I DO get credit for my work on the robot and for my work with one of our Lego League teams preparing for the competition we're organizing on May 22. Lego League is the perfect complement to FIRST, I can understand what my teacher has to deal with and I get a chance to inspire other kids for a change. BTW, all you schools who don't have Lego League teams, look out-these junior leagues are going to produce some amazingly talented engineers. :-Dan : How about instead of having the advanced lego league, why doesn't FIRST start the Lego League in september, and have current high schools involved with FIRST be the mentors to the younger students in the lego league. This would help get high school students prepared for FIRST, while allowing them to incorperate Lego League into their school's curriculum and incite intrest from the younger middle and elementary school students. Just think, high school students will begin to see what the program is like from an engineers point of view as the mentors while the younger students will gain the experience of FIRST not only through the Lego League, but also through the stories of FIRST that the high school students can pass on to them. You can't miss!!! Think about it. : Cya all, : Andy Grady, DWC/Alvirne HS |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: School credit for robot building
Posted by Tim Murray, Student on team #126, Gael Force, from Clinton High School and NYPRO inc..
Posted on 5/9/99 7:59 AM MST In Reply to: Re: School credit for robot building posted by Andy Grady on 5/8/99 3:06 PM MST: Andy, Another great idea. Unfortunately, some it is already being done. FIRST is having a lego league and it's taking place in september. I love that idea so much and i think that FIRST will benefit greatly from it. I have already, along with a few other returning students, asked to mentor some of the students at the middle school. The way the lego league is set up. a team is composed of about 5-7 students (i think) so a middle school could send multiple teams down there and FIRST students could take a team by themselves receiving help from teachers if they needed. All in all, I think that this lego league will be a huge success and i'd like to say hats off to FIRST for putting this together and i hope they'll stay away from tri-alliances in this league ![]() Tim |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
There ya go
Posted by Tim Murray, Student on team #126, Gael Force, from Clinton High School and NYPRO inc..
Posted on 5/9/99 7:52 AM MST In Reply to: School credit for robot building posted by Andrew Trax on 5/8/99 4:42 AM MST: : 'But I noticed one thing at 2007...the students are doing the : design process FOR COURSE CREDIT....' : Some high schools have incorporated FIRST into the curriculum. It isn't : just an after school activity. : You make an excellent point. The level of time, money and effort is : dispropportionate to the school credit some of the students receive. But : I really believe that as more high schools get involved, we may see the : robotics teams competing weekly against other local high schools just as : the sports teams do. : What if the kits and rules were available to classrooms in September. Maybe : even the previous year's kits. Call them 'non-national team kits' and a reduced : price. Spread them throughout a school district and make it intramural. : Leave participation in Regionals and the National as an option. But make : the game a local sport as well. It would almost be an 'Advanced Lego League'. : And isn't that the real goal? To make science and technology as exciting : and rewarding as any sport? : Mrs. Trax You're absolutely right! I believe that playing time will increase as regionals increase and the best way to do that is by helping FIRST grow. The idea with the kit and giving them out at the fall sounds great to me. That's probably the best idea i've heard on this forum so far. We're a couple years away from dividing up into divisions and going into all of this far-fetched stuff that people on this forum often write about. But for now, one way to make things fair and get more teams seems to be right in Mrs. Trax' suggestion. I hope FIRST heard that idea! Tim |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players
Posted by MaryEllen, Other on team #180, S.P.A.M., from South Fork and Martin County High Schools and UTC/Pratt & Whitney, FL.
Posted on 5/8/99 3:50 PM MST In Reply to: To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players posted by michael bastoni on 5/7/99 7:12 PM MST: : I just returned from 2 days at the MIT 2007 Design Competition. I've been searching the 'net for info about 2007 and haven't bumped into anything. If you have an web address, I'd like to check it out. Thanks ME |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
2.007 at MIT
Posted by Frank, Coach on team #97, Psychedelics, from CRLS and MIT.
Posted on 5/8/99 4:01 PM MST In Reply to: Re: To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players posted by MaryEllen on 5/8/99 3:50 PM MST: Here's a link to the 2.007 homepage. http://pergatory.mit.edu/2.007/ For those that don't know, 2.007 is a small robot design competition at MIT (small in comparison to FIRST). It's done mainly by sophomores in mech E although anyone who's taken 2.001 (Intro class for Mech E.) and 2.670 (A class on using shop machenery) is welcome to compete. Frank Bentley Team 97 - MIT/CRLS '99 Team 111- WildStang '96-'98 |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players
Posted by Bethany Dunning, Coach on team #163, Quantum Mechanics, from International Academy and Quantum Consultants/EATON/ITT Industries.
Posted on 5/9/99 10:22 AM MST In Reply to: To Kate,JJ and other frustrated players posted by michael bastoni on 5/7/99 7:12 PM MST: We just got our robot back from Florida (it decided to spend a few days on the beach after the team left, judging by the sunburn ;-) and I am so looking forward to playing with it. As coach, I have yet to drive the machine, and am desperately looking forward to trying my hand at it! : : It is PLAYING WITH THE ROBOT that is just as inspirational : as building it.... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|