|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hadn't read section 8 yet. After someone above mentioned R65, I read it and saw this clause that signaling devices shall "not use changes in the signal states to encode or transmit larger messages (e.g. Morse code)." I guess this means that the "loophole" wouldn't work.
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robocoach signals loophole?
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robocoach signals loophole?
If you were really clever, you could implement your four instructions as something like "Virtual Button 1, Virtual Button 2, Next Button Set, Previous Button Set" Technically that would be 4 instructions, but would give you practically unlimited results.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robocoach signals loophole?
yeah but aren't there controls that have programmable buttons?
cant you just say this button but that button would include a series of programed keys |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robotics Hand Signals | JulieB | Chit-Chat | 21 | 19-06-2005 00:11 |
| PWM Signals | stevex | Programming | 1 | 28-10-2004 18:03 |
| IR signals inverted | Atheist | Electrical | 10 | 08-02-2004 16:27 |
| Autonomous user-input loophole? | Jeff McCune | Programming | 20 | 14-02-2003 22:44 |
| Referee hand signals | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 21:57 |