Go to Post Dave doesn't predict the future. He creates it. - Alan Anderson [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 2000
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 21:56
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeding Calculations

Posted by Jason Morrella.

Coach on team #254, Cheesy Poofs/Bay Bombers, from Broadway High and NASA Ames.

Posted on 9/2/99 1:00 PM MST


In Reply to: Re: Seeding Calculations posted by Jon on 8/30/99 2:53 PM MST:



: this is interesting... a simple bonus pointage system instead of a multiplier... small (points) victories are rewarded instead of super pointage... more like the NBA/NFL/NHL/et al

To clarify: the multipliers (2x, 3x, 3x) were still in effect for raised floppies, puck location, and puck control. Team could still max out with 540 points. The only difference was the final victory reward.
It evenly rewarded teams for winning with 300 bonus points instead of a 3x multiplier. A team which won with a total of 400 points would finish with 700. A team which won with a total of 70 points would finish with 370.
So in the qualifying seedings, two winning alliances with scores of 400 and 70 respectively would have 700 and 370 with this system, not 1200 and 210 with the 3x multiplier system.
I think most agree that the point is to have a good strategy, execute it, and win. It seems that in the above example, the winning teams being seperated by 1000 points is basically punishing the team which won with a defensive strategy.
It worked well at the exhibition in Anaheim and I thought it was worth throwing out for people to consider. So consider away.

Jason


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Championship Seeding Mike Martus Championship Event 18 26-07-2003 12:34
VCU low seeding matches... archiver 2001 14 24-06-2002 02:03
Possible seeding problem at regionals archiver 2001 10 23-06-2002 22:25
Great Lakes Regional Seeding Scores are up ... (EOM) archiver 1999 4 23-06-2002 22:12
Possible Rule change for Flordia? (Please) and the reason for more seeding rounds. archiver 1999 6 23-06-2002 22:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:25.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi